Rasmus Lerdorf schrieb:
> Adding a check on every refcount increase is a bit
> scary for the performance folks. It may be that in most realworld cases
> this is an acceptable performance tradeoff. We have to balance the
> seriousness of the vulnerability against the performance cost of the
> fix.
> If his cache had no locking before, what changed?
Well, I have been using several cache classes. A good cache class is the
pear cache light.
This cache is serializing your data and write this data to a file - of
course with file locking.
I could imagine, that a improved serialize-function coul
Hallo,
I use pear cache (light) to save calculated values. The package uses
serialize to transform the content of a variable into a writable form.
This transformed value will be saved to disk.
This could be improved! Would it be possible to rewrite the serialize
function to make it possible
Hi,
there is a inconsistency in using utf-8.
If you use tiny_html
(http://de2.php.net/manual/en/function.tidy-repair-string.php), you have
to use "utf8" to encode your data in utf-8.
If you use html_entity_decode()
(http://de2.php.net/manual/en/function.html-entity-decode.php), you have
to
Hallo
a little suggestion to the PHP change log. I think, that it should be
mentioned, who has found a bug. This could improve the security of php
because someone who has found a bug will report it to php first, because
he/she will be mentioned in the php change log. If not, the only
reason
Good morning,
I have a little problem with a php script which uses really lots of
memory. Until now, I have thought that PHP will free variable memory
after the end of a function. But it seems, that this is not true.
simple variables:
function readData() {
$data = file_get_contents("C:/phpPr
Andi Gutmans schrieb:
Hi,
I thought I may have brought this up a long time ago but couldn't find anything
in the archives.
For a long time already I've been thinking about possibly adding a new syntax
for array(...) which would be shorter. I'd suggest
[...]. While I am usually not in favor of
Richard Lynch schrieb:
On Thu, November 9, 2006 9:13 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
It looks a bit perl-ish indeed but I don't see much trouble
in having that it people really need it...
-0.3
:-)
The thing is, I see this ending up with people starting to write
unintelligible code:
echo {$$(foo()[4
Richard Lynch schrieb:
On Mon, November 13, 2006 4:42 am, Mathias Bank wrote:
As you see, with this macro functions, it could be achieved any
individual syntax. It would be a pleasure, if php could support it. It
could shorten a lot of code.
It sounds like you could submit a patch and get it
Mathias Bank schrieb:
Hallo,
you know, that there was often a discussion about a "ifsetor" function.
I want to generalize this discussion. If you know LISP, there is a
fantastic macro function which allows you to generate own syntax (not a
c macro function, which is really bad). I
Hallo,
you know, that there was often a discussion about a "ifsetor" function.
I want to generalize this discussion. If you know LISP, there is a
fantastic macro function which allows you to generate own syntax (not a
c macro function, which is really bad). It would be fantastic, if php
could
11 matches
Mail list logo
