Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discussion] Typed Properties

Hi Joe, > Accessing the property before it was unset though, as it always did, > attempts to read the default value (null). > > We haven't changed any of that ... > Yes, you're right, this is exactly how it currently behaves : https://3v4l.org/YpfYe (apologies for not checking this first). Stil

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC Discussion] Typed Properties

Hi all, first up, major thanks to both Joe and Phil for putting this together. I'm fully behind the concept of typed properties and think it would be a great feature to have in the language. I have a few points I'd like to make on the current implementation being proposed. 1) There's an issue

[PHP-DEV] Allowing static as a return type

Hi Internals, whilst recently playing with return type hints on PHP 7 I noticed that "static" cannot be used as a valid return type. I'm not entirely sure whether this has been purposely prevented or not. https://3v4l.org/LEXis The behaviour works it's just a parse error that's stopping it. It

Re: [PHP-DEV] About declare(strict_types = 1)

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > Hi Derick, > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Xinchen Hui wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pierre Joye > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 16, 2015 4:29 PM, "Xinchen Hui" w

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous Classes

Hi Phil. I really like this feature and am keen to see it go in. Developers often create classes (which are typically new files) just to extend and implement a small method. This feature could see codebases become much lighter. So a massive thanks for your and Joe’s efforts on this. I have tw

Re: [PHP-DEV] Use behavior thoughts

Hi Anthony. This issue that has plagued me in the past, specifically with the use of traits: Error: http://3v4l.org/VFguK OK: http://3v4l.org/73b86 Although when combined with opcache does causes very confusing behaviour, I do worry that removing the error altogether may make it worse fo

Re: [PHP-DEV] foreach() for strings

I think this would be quite a useful feature, and am In favor of it. However, I think caution should be taken when shifting array utilities out of their remit and allowing them to manipulate / traverse other data types. You may see the floodgates opening for more request to adapt array functions fo