Hi Guilherme.
On 14.03.11 19:02, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
> @Etienne: That RFC is outdated.
> Since the last feedback form internals list, a lot of changes have
> been made to that RFC. Maybe I should update it ASAP so you can
> clearly understand what have changed to be compatible with cu
Hi.
On 13.01.10 16:48, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Alain Williams wrote:
>> Unfortunately: APC does not work with PHP 5.3 -- I have a site where I would
>> love to use it but I cannot. I use APC to great effect elsewhere.
Hm. I have 5.3.1 with APC 3.1.3p1 and it runs fine. This is not a
production en
Hi.
On 16.01.10 02:54, Matt Read wrote:
> We are developers from the Habari Project, an open source PHP blogging
> application; We would like to raise concern with a recent change to the
> logic of PDO.
I fully support what Matt writes. Although we don't use that behaviour
in our codebase, the wa
Hi.
On 26.10.09 15:25, Mathieu Suen wrote:
> I am more asking about performance.
I would have been ready to sacrifice performance if it saved money. But
according to my quick tests, it does not. See http://tr.im/DrsH for
details... oh, this is on PHP 5.3.
Any other insights on this welcome!
Reg
Hi.
On 08.07.2009 12:11 Uhr, Steven Van Poeck wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
With this logic, we got a PHP 5.3 as well, and with the same logic
there will be a PHP 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 and we never get to 6. Instead of
putting stuff in PHP 5.4 (which at the moment is *not* planned), why
not focus all ef
Hi Lukas.
On 04.06.2009 8:40 Uhr, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
To me its absolutely critical that we do not give the impression that
the next bigger update after 5.3 will be 5.4. The next big thing is 6.0.
Thumbs up, and good luck with this ambitious plan! ;) We'd be happy to
switch to PHP 6...
Hi Alexey.
On 03.04.2009 12:33 Uhr, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
well, and what is the reason why you can't make your "attach()"
compatible with SplObjectStorage's?
the following signature works for me (both in 5.2 and 5.3):
public function attach($obj, $inf = null)
Doh, well. Even better, so it'
Hi.
I am trying to extend SplObjectStorage and override the attach() method.
This gives me:
Strict Standards: Declaration of B::attach() should be compatible with
that of SplObjectStorage::attach() in test.php on line 5
Seems am am hitting the object type hint wall again. Any ways around
t
Hi.
On 31.03.2009 18:08 Uhr, David Coallier wrote:
I'm sorry to tell you that but xdebug web profiling was a project for
last year. Please read http://wiki.php.net/gsoc/2009 for this years
GSoC ideas.
Well, was it done last year? If yes: great, where is it? If no: yeah, do
it this year!
Reg
Hi.
On 19.02.2009 6:34 Uhr, Eric Stewart wrote:
allow_call_time_pass_reference = Off (Issue Warnings)
+1
Karsten
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Eric.
On 17.02.2009 8:02 Uhr, Eric Stewart wrote:
extension_dir = "./"
Should be commented out as has been pointed out already by Johannes
Schlüter.
enable_dl = On
enable_dl should be off(). Well, that has been said a few time already... :)
By now I also think that allow_call_time_p
Hi.
On 11.02.2009 15:26 Uhr, Christian Schneider wrote:
session.bug_compat_42 = Off ; Why should devel/production differ?
Because in dev a warning should be shown, but the warning setting only
has an effect if this setting is on (at least that way it is documented
in php.ini).
Regards,
Kar
Hi Eric.
On 10.02.2009 3:27 Uhr, Eric Stewart wrote:
A new RFC for PHP's proposed INI files have been added to the wiki. Below is
a direct link to the page.
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/newinis
I love the settings for production, but I think you reversed the meaning
of allow_call_time_pass_referen
Hi.
On 03.02.2009 10:51 Uhr, Richard Quadling wrote:
PS: Let the idea grow for another eight years! :)
When PHP6 becomes the norm with its lovely unicode handling, BOM's may
become more prevalent. If the editor of choice supplies them, having
PHP strip them from include/require would be helpfu
Hi.
On 02.02.2009 9:28 Uhr, mike wrote:
There's some discussion going on -discuss about whether or not to
close PHP tags.
...
Obviously the bonus is no stupid human error/whitespace type issues
with output buffering and such. But I wanted to know if there's any
opinion either way for any othe
Hi.
On 21.01.2009 11:44 Uhr, Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
I did propose the function because the construction in user-land is quite
expensive;
Reflection is expensive, indeed. The way we solved it for FLOW3 is to
create a ReflectionService that caches such information as long as the
source doesn'
Hi.
On 16.01.2009 17:12 Uhr, Pierre Joye wrote:
The problem is exactly the same on any OS, only the size varies. The
limit is not higher either. What do you use as naming for your
entries?
Oe example with 229 characters:
/Users/karsten/Sites/typo3v5/Data/Temporary/6e7991cd3e3f10e110df4a26825c1
Hi Pierre.
On 16.01.2009 14:33 Uhr, Pierre Joye wrote:
While NTFS supports path lengths of up to 32k characters,
By the way, this limit is approximative.
In what way?
There is no plan yet to increase this value. The main problem is that
the maximum length of a path is volume dependent, not
Hi everyone.
I posted this on php.windows a two days ago without a response. Maybe
someone here can help me.
Recently someone using our software told us about problems with
generated filenames being too long. I did some research on the net and
some quick tests on Vista Business, and it seem
parsers, you have to pass it a PHP array or object.
+1
Karsten Dambekalns
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi.
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
According to the manual and the PHP source the signature is this:
public function getValue(stdclass $object)
...
Use public function getValue($object = null) {} instead.
Thanks, that works! I saw the [] in the C source, but failed to draw the
right conclusion
Hi.
Running 5.3.0alpha3 now and converting our codebase to the new
namespaces syntax. Works fine so far, the new name resolution rules are
very usable and lead to cleaner code so far. :)
Now I ran into a problem. We have a class extending ReflectionProperty,
and I got a complaint about the s
Hi Derick.
Derick Rethans wrote:
This is not the correct thing to do, as you will lose timezone
information. The W3C format only stores UTC offsets (in the form of
+00:00). However, that same UTC offset can be used in different areas
with different DST changes. Best thing is to store in Unix t
Hi.
Christopher Vogt wrote:
I fetch records a database. Sometime it happens that a record does not
exist anymore. Let's assume it's a user, then $user will be NULL.
echo $user['fullname']; // no error at all, $user['fullname'] === NULL
Shouldn't this at least trigger a Notice?
Check your err
Hi.
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
1) ext/mhash in 5.3. ext/hash has all the functions, so the entire BC
break will be that "if (extension_loaded('mhash'))" will need fixing if
mhash is removed (answer both)
I) enable ext/hash by default
II) remove ext/mhash
+1 for both
2) deprecate ereg*. ext/er
Hi.
Steph Fox wrote:
This thread really should be re-titled to "allow reserved words as a
classname or not". Then perhaps the only logical response to the
question would be so obvious that there would be no thread... oo-er...
Right, the subject indicates a different question that what seems t
Hi.
Stan Vassilev | FM wrote:
I suggest we introduce a new construct which will return a string
when passed any identifier to resolve against the current file's use
clauses:
nameof Symbol\Name;
...
NOTE: As a side effect this means less direct writing of string
function/class names, and less
Hi.
Stan Vassilev | FM wrote:
A yet another compromise is possible as the lesser evil:
...
They key change is: not to make difference between internal and user
global functions, just fall back to global ones, so that there's no
additional confusion among drop-in replacements, user resources,
Hi.
Sorry for yet another OT post in this thread.
Josh Davis wrote:
I have a question about 3. Where in a script can you use the "use"
statement? Could it be used inside conditionals? For example,
if ($testing) {
use class testing::PDO;
} else {
use class ::PDO;
}
I hope this is a ba
Hi Greg, everyone.
Greg Beaver wrote:
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues
Read it and discuss. Let's be clear people: the technical problems in
namespaces are limited and solvable. The problems in the political
environment surrounding them may not be. Wouldn't politics be a
stupid-ass re
en
[1] http://forge.typo3.org/repositories/show/package-php6
[2] http://forge.typo3.org/repositories/show/packages
--
Karsten Dambekalns
FLOW3 & TYPO3 Development
TYPO3 Association
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
eature would be less ready to repeat the
ordeal.
I heartily second that.
Regards,
Karsten
--
Karsten Dambekalns
FLOW3 & TYPO3 Development
TYPO3 Association
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
just evaporate into nothingness are
somewhat different. No?
Trying to be cynical,
Karsten
--
Karsten Dambekalns
FLOW3 & TYPO3 Development
TYPO3 Association
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
een hoping and waiting for for years?
Regards,
Karsten
--
Karsten Dambekalns
FLOW3 & TYPO3 Development
TYPO3 Association
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi.
For what it's worth, my point of view:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
1. Allow braces for namespaces. So, the syntax for namespaces will be:
a) namespace foo;
should be first (non-comment) statement in the file, namespace extends
to the end of the file or next namespace declaration.
b) namespa
Hi.
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Yes. Changing :: into any other separator solves the functions/static
methods and constants ambiguity, but it also breaks intuitive syntax.
Well, I'd say those having problems to grok the syntax will have
problems getting the whole concept of namespaces. :)
That bei
Hi.
Michael Wallner wrote:
I wonder what the general opinion is on adding pecl/http to the main PHP
distribution? Many people have poked me in the past, so I guessed it's
time to ask me and you that question once for all.
Not that I have a lot to say here, but +∞ from my side as well.
Karste
37 matches
Mail list logo
