Hello,
I play a little bit with the new mysqli replication functions. during the
tests nothing happend, so that I think that these functions are currently in
beta status. when could I use these new mysqli replication functions, any
timeframe?
thanks a lot and great work so far!
best regards, JM
install/php5-200403100030/ext/mysqli/mysqli.c:559: error: parse error
before ')' token
best regards
juergen mueller
--
+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
hi,
got the following parsing error with latest php5 snapshot and php5beta4.
./configure --with-mysqli=/usr/local/mysql/bin/mysql_config
--with-mysql=/install/mysql/ --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
/install/php-5.0.0b4/ext/mysqli/php_mysqli.h:48: parse error before
`MYSQL_STMT'
/install/
Hi,
i would like to install the standard mysql extension together with the new
mysqli extension. the documentation say, that in this case the bundled
libmysql libary in PHP cannot be used. furthermore it recommended to use the client
libaries installed by MySQL below Version 4.1
in /usr/mysql res
hi guys,
during I played around with the new mysqli extension in PHP 5.0, I missed
some really important functions: mysql_list_dbs(), mysql_db_name(),
mysql_list_tables(), mysql_tablename()
why didn't these functions be ported to the MySQLi Extension?
It would be great if anyone could answe
hi,
I established a really strange behaviour of mysqli_options(). with the
following commands, I got a sucessfull connection object, without setting the
connection params (host, user, passwd) in mysqli_real_connect(). Is this a Bug?
$link = mysqli_init();
mysqli_options($link, MYSQLI_CLIENT_COMP
hi,
one question to the mysqli OO Syntax. it is correct that the extensibility
of new functions in php classes was the main goal to introduce it? besides the
fact, that the code in general is more readable as with the old ext mysql.
with extensibility I mean class foo_mysql extends mysqli { ... }
> Nope, this is the better thing as the link is always required anyway and
> it's more logical to do it like this as most other DB and other
> extensions what their object/resource as first parameter.
okay you're right!
but it increased the migration process from ext/mysql to ext/mysqli in my
opin
hi,
I'am a little astonished concerning the modify function parameter order.
mysqli_query ( object link, string query [, int resultmode]) for example expect
the object link after the sql query. in the old ext/mysql it is completly
reversed. I think this is bad for a possible migration from ext/mys
message "Call to
undefined function mysqli_multi_query()".
when is it planed to implement this function?
best regards
juergen mueller
--
GMX ProMail (250 MB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS, Virenschutz, 2,99 EUR/Monat...)
jetzt 3 Monate GRATIS + 3x DER SPIEGEL +++ http://www.gmx.net/derspiegel ++
10 matches
Mail list logo