ere and shed some light on the matter.
>
I'd prefer to keep it in the tree. Let me talk to the people I know at
Oracle and see. If they won't maintain it, my company will.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
ked above
> are all basically dead.
>
> You are of course welcome to put together a proposal and/or start up a
> discussion on the subject if it is something you would be prepared to put
> work into.
>
I, for one, severely dislike annotations. But, that's why there's an
h Rasmus. This doesn't belong *in* PHP. But, as long as you can
detect the speed, it would be easy to set an environment variable for or
develop a framework for apps to take it into account. Likewise, the
following sounds remarkably familiar to what you're talking about;
hopefully it helps:
happy to provide patch
updates/modifications on request.
Thank you for your time!
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
dd the notation as an option for developers to use.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jonah H. Harris
> wrote:
>
>> RFC updated with links to GCC, Python, and Ruby syntax definitions.
>>
>
> I just noticed the patch (written against 5.3) doesn't appl
Initial
benchmarks showed a 4-7% performance improvement in
serialization/deserialization.
I'll see if I can dig it up--hopefully it's not on my dead computer.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> RFC updated with links to GCC, Python, and Ruby syntax definitions.
>
I just noticed the patch (written against 5.3) doesn't apply cleanly to
trunk and will be updating that shortly. In that same vein, I wanted to
confirm
done, (3) the
> next step is JIT, and few months ago there was some work done on LLVM for
> this, but I never heard about it since. And only then, esoteric things like
> running on the GPU can be realistically pondered.
>
> So, long way ahead...
>
Agreed.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
;> languages.
>>
>
> Ah. Finally found something via Google. An ISO C99 extension not a part
> of ANSI C++ but accepted by GCC even in C++ mode. Learned something new
> today.
>
RFC updated with links to GCC, Python, and Ruby syntax definitions.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
atch then I
> see no problem.
>
This is correct--both evaluate to false. String parsing support for binary
literals was not added.
> Sorry for not trying the patch first and assuming that it would be similar
> to the other formats.
>
No worries.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
>> > I just registered for Wiki access and am waiting for the account to be
>> > approved. As soon as it is, I'll submit the RFC.
>>
>>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
> > I just registered for Wiki access and am waiting for the account to be
> > approved. As soon as it is, I'll submit the RFC.
>
> Done, you now access to the RFC namespace. Have fun :)
>
Awesome! Thanks.
--
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Will Fitch wrote:
> +1 here.
>
> Just want to make sure the RFC is written and discussed before the patch is
> submitted.
>
I just registered for Wiki access and am waiting for the account to be
approved. As soon as it is, I'll submit t
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Christopher Jones <
christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 10:18 PM, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Jonah H. Harris> >wrote:
>>
>> Cool. I'll put together an updated patch.
&g
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Cool. I'll put together an updated patch.
>
Source and documentation patches have been attached to the ticket.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
ine them in binary to begin with would help readability. (Yes,
> I
> just said "writing in binary" would "help readability." God help us all.
> )
>
;-)
Cool. I'll put together an updated patch.
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
few other languages.
If there's any interest, I'll clean up the patch and resubmit.
Thoughts?
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
While I have experience in compiler, interpreter, and virtual machine
development, I plan to work primarily on PDO-related items and cleanup. Sadly,
that's all I have time for these days :( Regardless, I've submitted patches in
the past--some have been applied, others are still pending; with y
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52384
--
Jonah H. Harris
Blog: http://www.oracle-internals.com/
documentation is incorrect, as bindValue can
take at most three arguments.
In the example:
$sth->bindValue(':colour', $colour, PDO::PARAM_STR, 12);
should be:
$sth->bindValue(':colour', $colour, PDO::PARAM_STR);
--
Jonah H. Harris, VP of Database Administration
myYe
ing. Not to sound
demeaning, but do you have any real need for what you're asking, or are you
just saying, "gee, it would be nice for me to be able to write a Comet
server in 99 lines of PHP that is capable of managing 60K concurrent
connections and a rate of 15K messages/second with
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Scott MacVicar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your patch was stripped, can you attach against with a .txt extension.
Attached.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com
diff -cr php5/ext/pdo/pdo_stmt.c php5-pdofix/ext/pdo/pdo_stmt.c
*** php5/ext/pdo/p
While using PDOStatement::debugDumpParams, I noticed that it results
in an endless loop because the hash table is not being traversed. As
such, attached is a patch against php5 HEAD which adds
zend_hash_move_forward_ex accordingly.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com
--
PHP
24 matches
Mail list logo