> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
>> On 7 December 2010 12:11, John Mertic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Richard Quadling
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 7 December 2010 07:08, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>>>>> The ver
execution.
>
> So, ini_set() will have no impact.
>
> Can you set an ini option for a single script via some other method?
>
Maybe thru an .htaccess file? That should work.
Otherwise, +1 for the patch from me.
John Mertic
jmer...@gmail.com | http://jmertic.wordpress.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
refore has unicode. So skipping the number "6" won't resolve
> any user confusion.
I think the unicode debacle will always give user's confusion,
especially since there's many many PHP 6 books on bookshelves that
speak of it. I think it's better to recognize what has
The big issue I saw was that fgetcsv() used PHP_EOL for determining
line endings, but fputcsv() didn't, which on Windows was causing csv
files written by PHP not be able to be read back ( assuming
auto_detect_line_endings is turned off ).
John Mertic
jmer...@gmail.com |
Hi All,
Bringing this one back once more; let me know what everyone thinks
about it. If it's safe to commit than if someone could ( or give me
the karma to do so ) that would be great. If not, let me know what
should be done about it instead.
Thanks!
John Mertic
jmer...@gmail.com |
Here's that test. I don't have commit rights to that area of CVS so
someone will need to do it for me.
John Mertic
jmer...@php.net
On 6/5/09 5:58 AM, Stan Vassilev wrote:
3. When the caller tries to retrieve $object->foo, and foo is a
private/protected member the caller has
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:28 PM, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You cannot use smart_str_appendc() in this case, since the EOL could be a 2
>> byte string "\r\n".
>
>>
>> - smart_str_appendc(&csvline, '\n');
>> + smart_str_appendc(&csvline, PHP_EOL);
>>smart_str_0(&csvline);
>>
>>ret = php_stream_write(stream, csvline.c, csvline.len);
>>
>>
>> John Mertic
>> [EMAIL PRO
Hi Ilia,
Sorry for my C confusion, like I said it's been awhile.
Anyways, would smart_str_appends() be the correct function to use then?
John Mertic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jmertic.wordpress.com
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you understand it
better, but the frog d
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.10.2008, 10:03 -0700 schrieb John Mertic:
> [...]
>> Below is a patch to fix this issue; it uses the constant PHP_EOL to
>> get the correct newline to use on the current platform:
>
> Thanks for your patch. A few things to mention, as it is
one much C in a
while ).
John Mertic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jmertic.wordpress.com
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you understand it
better, but the frog dies
in the process." --Mark Twain
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Walk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
530 file.c
2107c2107
< smart_str_appendc(&csvline, '\n');
---
> smart_str_appendc(&csvline, PHP_EOL);
John Mertic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jmertic.wordpress.com
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you understand it
better, but the frog dies
Thanks everyone!
I'd like to provide some help too with getting the the MSI installers
built. Especially on snaps.php.net where we haven't had a successful
MSI build in over 2 months ( some permissions issues ) and I know
there are some fixes for Vista and FastCGI configuration problems
solved.
J
What about Windows binaries? I'm not sure if we have had them for any
RC thus far...
John
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are hard at work on setting an RC record with 5.2.6, with the RC5.
> Nothing too unusual, this time just a few fairly trivial
line 0
>
>
>
> How can i eliminate that?? is that a problem of php installation???
>
>
> Thanks,
> Siva
>
--
John Mertic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jmertic.wordpress.com
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you understand it
better, but the frog dies
in
on win32 ( and when I mean actually
work, pull against the pre-built dlls on pecl4win ).
I can put together a framework for an installer if that's the route we
want to go.
Edin, can you no longer add in the PECL libraries to the installer
when building it...
--
--
John Mertic
ld be removed but moving the PECL
> extensions into a separate tree in the installer with a stable and
> unstable branch may be an idea. Or remove the ones in beta completely.
>
> Scott
>
> John Mertic wrote:
> > Make a list of what's considered non-stable and I can d
'm for removing the non stable PECL extensions or at least those that
> don't even load, especially before 5.2.4.
>
> Scott
>
> John Mertic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 7/2/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 03.07.2007 00:50
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/17/07, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In an effort to help the windows installer get more widespread use, I
> > would like to propose changing the following warning in the manual at
> > http://www.php.net/manual/en/in
ould be very much appreciated.
>
> Edin
>
>
> John Mertic wrote:
> > Edin,
> >
> > I noticed that I can't download 5.2.4RC installer builds; getting a
> > 403 - Forbidden error.
> >
> > Also the latest snapshot log is complaining about 'A
p://www.php.net/downloads.php
is the best choice to have your system secure and optimised."
I might be proposing this in the wrong place, but since the verbage
"endorsed by PHP.net" is in there I thought it would be prudent to
post it to i
.
Building installer failed
---snip---
--
--
John Mertic"Explaining a joke
is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it better,
but the frog dies in the
Hi,
On 7/2/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03.07.2007 00:50, John Mertic wrote:
>> If an author would like his extension in the Windows installer then they
>> could just ask, would prevent unmaintained and unstable extensions
>> included in the build.
erhaps
splitting them up based upon stability instead?
Scott
John Mertic wrote:
> On 2 Jul 2007 09:30:13 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The Windows Installer seems to allow someone to enable just about every
>> extension that can be built, roughly about 118. It seems that most
>&g
ad and put it up there?
--
--
John Mertic"Explaining a joke
is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it better,
but the frog dies in the
ink to http://www.php.net/downloads somewhere might
help the googler who lands on the snaps page but wants something
stable to use.
A problem even with the current snaps page is that the PHP logo doesn't
link to php.net. And I'd prefer the snap page had the stand php.net header
links.
C
Thanks for the compliments and the suggestion.
I've made the whole section underneath each branch in the light blue
highlighted color. I agree it makes it much easier to read now.
John
On 5/25/07, Christopher Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Mertic wrote:
> Below is a link
bars in the page ...
--
--
John Mertic"Explaining a joke
is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it better,
but the frog dies in the
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> Hi John
>
> On 5/25/07, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Below is a link to my take on the redesign:
>>
>> http://files.edin.dk/php/installer/snaps-html/index.html
>
> Looks really good.
Yes, it loo
or make the nicer looking page like above. This keeps the
snaps page cleaner since I would think most people would be looking
for the latest snap and not necessarily one of the previous 4 ones.
Let me know if my approach and design sounds reasonable.
--
--
John Mertic
wnloads as well?
--
--
John Mertic"Explaining a joke
is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it better,
but the frog dies in the
process."
ML and CSS on this.
--
--
John Mertic"Explaining a joke
is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it better,
but the frog dies in the
Maintaining Windows Installer.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ion: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFE5HodLKekh381/CERAlr+AJ0Uolmtdqsh6uzUlA4pp5RN53NXKACfUkHb
> 2r+8rAqZAsRsjh/PfHG9W7c=
> =zUzc
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s to Install' page I would
appreciate it.
Download from
http://mirrors.emini.eu/php-installer/php-5.2.0RC1-win32-installer.msi.
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] under
ou can upgrade it by issuing the following command:
msiexec /i php-5.2.0RC1-win32-installer.msi REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=vomus
Again any feedback would be appreciated.
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
What does everyone else think?
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it
better, but the frog dies in the
process."
-Mark Twain
--
P
without a DOS box, but you have to
> be careful to make sure that that command is available on the
> computer. That's why I'm thinking a simple PHP script ( the
> CustomActions I use run after the files are copied so PHP should be
> available then ).
mmkay, wasn't su
ble to execute a command without a DOS box, but you have to
be careful to make sure that that command is available on the
computer. That's why I'm thinking a simple PHP script ( the
CustomActions I use run after the files are copied so PHP should be
available then ).
Thanks again for all y
nually. I didn't see any obvious way to open a file for editing
from within a wix installer though - is that possible or not?
This isn't directly possible, but you can create call external scripts
to do this ( this is how IIS is configured ). Probably I'd do the same
here.
--
Lat
TED]> wrote:
Is this live yet? I have a newbie wanting to try IIS/PHP. Doesn't want
Sambar or Apache, and I don't have IIS.
On 24/07/06, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> With the guidance of Phil Driscoll, I have put together a new
> installer for
his ) is instead of one monolithic httpd.conf file,
they have it include the configuration for the various modules
seperately so that they can add and remove the config code cleanly.
That I could see working well; you'd still have the risk of a
non-working install, but making it work again
had to replace $1 everywhere
manually afterwards :( Results for core 5_2 attached, my copy's a couple of
weeks out of date but json doesn't have any at least...
This is everything that's in the core. Note they are extension-specific (on
the who
to go with your idea above ( a lite install that contains
only the built-in extensions and web server support ) we could
probably get it down to under 6mb. And I believe it should also be
possible to "upgrade" this to the full version as well.
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explainin
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 24, 2006 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Installer for PHP 5.2
To: Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/24/06, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) I didn't notice anywhere to
installer with fewer components and if so what would those
be?
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it
better, but the frog dies in the
process."
-
06, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is that there is no standard location for anything in PHP
on Windows, and a lot of people take advantage of, and rely on, that
fact.
--Wez.
On 6/10/06, John Mertic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, there is also an
r for
Windows and having something like this would *greatly* simplify things
for me.
--
Later,
John Mertic
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] understand it
better, but the frog dies in th
48 matches
Mail list logo
