On May 17, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
This would be, however, yet another level of complexity added to the
language...
OOP is already a level of complexity. If you're going to have OOP in
the language, it needs to support at least the standard needs that
developers have w
On May 4, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Pierre wrote:
On Thu, 04 May 2006 14:27:09 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("D. Dante Lorenso") wrote:
Detracting from my goal of having 'filled()' included in core, I'd
have to say that as I see input filtering defined, that could be
entirely written as part of Zend Framew
Sure, after you folks implement named parameters. :)
*ducks and tries to hide*
Jared
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:57 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I'd like to raise a motion to 'Give the Language a Rest'.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/u
While ideally it'd be nice to have named parameters used in the core
of PHP, I realize that's probably an impossible task at the moment.
So I agree that the main goal is to allow users to define APIs in PHP
using this feature. If that's all we had, it'd be good enough I
think. (At least, it
On Jan 12, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Aidan Lister wrote:
As useful functions tend to increase in complexity over time,
often so
does the number of parameters.
It soon gets to the point where function calls look like:
foo(true, false, false, false, false, true)
The rest of the
On Dec 1, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Sebastian Kugler wrote:
On 12/1/05, Jared White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still say its main selling point is
that the calling code is its own API documentation.
why don't you just write something like
cycle(/* name: */ "myCycle", /
On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:59 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Ron Korving wrote:
Named parameter example:
Your example misses the main advantage of named parameters IMHO:
Sets of parameters you don't want to or can't explicitely list
because they are not know yet.
function adduser($params)
On Nov 30, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Can you explain your reasoning behind "essential for using PHP as a
solid templating language" and "nothing is a good substitute for
the real deal"?
- Andrei
OK, to take an example from Smarty, you could do a value cycle (for
multi-row-
Hi folks,
I just got on the list -- I've been a big fan of PHP for several
years and am throughly enjoying PHP 5. Good work folks, and once I
can get 5.1 set up on my OS X box I'm sure it's be even better.
I've been very interested in hearing about PHP 6 feature discussions,
and the meeti
