+1 from me
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Last week or so there was a fairly detailed discussion on the internals
> list regarding type hinting based on my original patch. Since then the patch
> has been revised to address the major concerns that were identified
> (bre
2008/7/28 Antony Dovgal
> On 26.07.2008 02:48, Markus Fischer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [CCing interested parties based on the last mail exchange on this topic]
>>
>> will the deprecation of ticks affect the usage of pcntl_signal? The manual
>> says [1] "... As of PHP 4.3.0 PCNTL uses ticks as the si
If I understand correctly I vote.
+1 for Issue 1 option 1
+1 for Issue 2
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues
>
> Read it and discuss. Let's be clear people: the technical problems in
> namespaces are limited a
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Jean-philippe Serafin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many people have starting working on top level application using
> namespaces, so there will a very bad buzz over the php community if
> namespaces are ripped out...
There code should work fine in PHP 6 without
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> On 10 Oct 2008, at 06:03, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> 1) rip them out
>>
>
> I'm +1 on this. We simply don't have consensus, and I don't see anyway we
> can have consensus by the time 5.3 has to be frozen. Once nam
+1 from me
in PHP 5.3 deprecation notices have been split of from E_STRICT into
E_DEPRECATED
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Nathan Nobbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everbody,
>>
>> regarding my mail from yesterda
I would agree, they seem to cause more problems and pollution than it would
solve.
I like the idea behind namespaces but what I've seen of the current
implementations I would rather do without.
Unfortunately I don't have any ideas or solutions to the problems.
/James Dempster
On T
I find it interesting that we could quite possibly get just as many clashes
with namespaced code.
Of course it comes down to how well the developer implements there code.
It's almost like namespace is just a method of aliasing long class names.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008, James Dempster wrote:
> > I would agree with you, I think namespaces should wait for a later
> version.
> > Maybe 6 or even later. I believe there are many problems that
me name (no errors or anything).
>
> 3) different resolution rules for userspace and internal functions.
>
> 4) subtly different resolution rules for functions/classes/constants
>
> So I'm trying to to address 1) in this thread.
>
> Regards,
> Stan Vassilev
>
>
what I find really annoying about all this namespace stuff, is how would
that be any different from
class Fully_Qualified_Class_Name_Declaration { }
/James
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Stan Vassilev | FM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I suppose this has been discussed before, so I'l
I find the namespace resolution rules quite confusing. It's become quite
difficult to tell if I'm calling a static method or a function, or
namespaced static method or namespaced function, and so on. I don't quite
fully understand or appreciated the point of namespaces. If some one could
help me ou
I would start by saying it's bad design. you should use getters and setters
which you can define in you interface
--
/James
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John Carter -X (johncart - PolicyApp Ltd
at Cisco) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> I understand why Interfaces can't have bodies,
iconv_mime_encode seems a bit broken for Q scheme, see
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43314
Could some one please apply the patch to CVS trunk. I've tested and it seems
to work.
Thanks
--
/James
Hi All,
My first post here. :-)
Just started using PHP_5_3 for a development project. It's a fairly long
project so 5.3 should be out before it's finished.
My reason for using PHP_5_3 was for late static binding (been longing
for this feature).
While using 5.3 I also get to test the develo
15 matches
Mail list logo
