Hi all,
It sounds like scalar objects by Nikita:
https://github.com/<https://github.com/nikic/scalar_objects>nikic<https://github.com/nikic/scalar_objects>/scalar_objects<https://github.com/nikic/scalar_objects>
Regards,
Iván Arias.
Get Outlook for Android<h
oken? I think there are a lot of them we can use, and for sure anyone
has its preference; and that’s why I was also suggesting to pick a few of them,
vote them in the RFC, and go with the winner.
Regards,
Iván Arias.
of them rather than a double symbol.
Would it be possible to add a multioption vote and let people choose?
Regards,
Iván Arias.
t a Little question. I see this other document in the same repo:
https://github.com/Danack/FunctionTypes/blob/master/3_referencing_functions_and_callables.md
Are you planning to also raise it?
As userland developer it really bothers me to type function and method names in
strings.
Thanks in advance!
Un saludo,
Iván Ari
n. From the RFC:
> Attributes are added before the declaration they belong to, similar to
> do-block comments. They can be declared before or after a doc-block comment
> that documents a declaration.
Could annotations be declared before AND after the doc-block?
What would be the behavior in that case?
Regards,
Iván Arias.
can only be used
under some circustances. I think I would prefer to simply do not include them
for now, and discuss these “block expressions” in another RFC as they seem to
be an independent language feature.
Regards,
Iván Arias.
2 => {
var();
} // Error, return statement is required
}
Would be feasible for the fallthrought problem to use “continue” when you
really want to chain “cases”?
match ($x) {
0 => {
// Only for 0
continue; // Same as omitting a break in a traditional switch
},
1 => {
// Same for 0 and 1
}
}
Regards,
Iván Arias.
posible, 1st for compatibility, but maybe
it could be a bit less redundant with the David’s proposed syntax:
$arr[] = …[1, 2, 3];
I wonder if it will even better in terms of performance…
[1] https://3v4l.org/7rbiX
Regards,
Iván Arias.
Hi all,
I think David's syntax make more sense. Maybe we could support multiple
arguments for push operator, just like array_push does:
$arr[] = 1, 2, 3; // push these 3 values
$arr[] = 1, 2, ... [3, 4, 5], 6; // push these 6 values
Regards,
Iván Arias.
Obtener Outlook para Android&
