It might be a nice feature to add the C++ friend keyword.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
This was never resolved:
Is this, or is this not a bug:
class A
{
var $a;
}
$A = new A;
$A->a = array(1);
$array = &$A->a;
$clone = clone $A;
$clone->a = array(); //Affects a in $A.
print_r($A);
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net
Also, direct usage of classnames should be allowed, and in this case,
the usual syntax should be used.
ClassName->staticMethod();
On 22 Feb 2004, at 12:30 AM, Josh Fuhs wrote:
$stringName::staticMethod();
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://ww
Isn't this a contradiction?
On 21 Feb 2004, at 9:10 PM, Art Hundiak wrote:
static methods and
static class variables should be consistent. Currently, you cannot
access a
class variable via an object instance.
And for what it's worth, I see no reason why static methods cannot be
called
from ob
It would be interesting to have variable methods:
$object->method = 'method1';
$object->method();
The trouble is all of the extra method mechanisms, so perhaps functions
should be defined with access too. Also, one should be able to include
$this or have it understood.
public function method1($
hod();
Herr Witten
C++ allows $a->bar() when bar() is a static method (yes, it is called
in a static context there too).
IMO, there should be no error, warning or notice here.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
This too:
class A
{
var $a = array();
public function &getA()
{
return $this->a;
}
}
$A = new A;
$A->a = array(1);
$array = &$A->getA();
$clone = clone $A;
$clone->a = array();
print_r($A);
On 15 Feb 2004, at 9:14 PM, Herr Witten wrote:
Here, I
Here, I have reproduced the problem:
class A
{
var $a = array();
public function makeAReference()
{
$array = $this->getA();
}
public function &getA()
{
return $this->a;
}
}
$A = new A;
$A->a = array(1);
$A->makeAReference();
$clone = clone $A;
$clone->a
first as i said do the following to verify:
It's a nice example, but it doesn't apply. I don't make a reference.
second read the docs and question such things on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did. This problem seemed to be internal, and it still does.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
That should be clone $object for the example.
On 15 Feb 2004, at 7:39 PM, Herr Witten wrote:
$clone = clone $cell;
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
More specifically,
This causes a change in $object:
$clone = clone $object;
$clone->troublesomeVariable = array();
But this doesn't:
$clone = clone $cell;
$clone = null;
$clone->_subElements = array();
On 15 Feb 2004, at 7:35 PM, Herr Witten wrote:
It appears that only one of the va
It appears that only one of the variables, an array, is being shared
across these multiple objects, but other array variables are not.
Moreover, When I make a clone and then set the clone to null, all
clones made thereafter are correct.
$clone = clone $object;
$clone = null;
Also, I can't repli
I forgot to mention: I am use b4
On 15 Feb 2004, at 5:45 PM, Herr Witten wrote:
It appears that cloning is broken, since a modification to the clone
modifies the original. For my __clone method implementation, I allow
all of the variables to be set by default except for one. But this
problem
It appears that cloning is broken, since a modification to the clone
modifies the original. For my __clone method implementation, I allow
all of the variables to be set by default except for one. But this
problem persists even when I don't modify that one variable.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtim
14 matches
Mail list logo
