x27;t have the required
credentials to login to the associated account :)
We apologize in advance to all the list members that are not related to
this issue. We didn't know how else to proceed :(
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
[image: uc?id=0Bxs12uFOzYYKZE5jSmtxWTBMX0U&export=download]
*
I didn't say PHP tags were valid XML. I said short_open_tag conflicts
with Hi,
>
> A vote in support of short tags, although last time I checked they
> were not removed in PHP6 (and I hate to see this brought up once more).
> On top of that, the supposed XML conflict argument is not fully
> though
Why such a complicated-looking thing (that breaks syntax-highlighting,
at least in my IDE), when you can just use:
'; ?>
Or turn short_open_tag off (and asp_tags on), and use:
...
<%= $this->that; %>
Glen.
Kenan Sulayman wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Whenever I start an X
Which horse are you referring to exactly?
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> PLEASE, let the dead horse be!
>
> --Jani
>
>
> Glen wrote:
>> Right, but at the moment something like:
>>
>> that;?>
>>
>> .. works. i.e. no whitespace after the opening tag.
Thanks for the information, Philip.
I hereby summon the BDFL ... erm, no pressure. :-)
I really think ASP/JSP tags could be the answer.
Glen.
Philip Olson wrote:
>
> Today this topic may be the cloudiest and most heated in all of PHP.
> Here's the factual history of o
Right, but at the moment something like:
that;?>
... works. i.e. no whitespace after the opening tag.
Changing this would most likely break a fair amount of code.
Glen.
Evert | Filemobile wrote:
>
> On 13-Apr-09, at 4:06 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
I'm not suggesting anyone be forced to do anything.
But:
...
<%= $this->that; %>
Looks neater than:
'; ?>
...
that; ?>
Hence my suggestion.
Glen.
Mike Panchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
>
>> It
espect the use of other processing instructions).
Glen.
Jeremy wrote:
> Glen wrote:
>>
>> It's short, and it doesn't conflict with XML.
>>
>
> I have to say, I don't understand all the hate on short_open_tag. So
> what if it "conflicts" with
long) thread* regarding
short_open_tag, and no one mentioned this as an option.
<%= $article->title; %>
It's short, and it doesn't conflict with XML.
Glen.
* http://www.mail-archive.com/php-...@lists.php.net/msg43002.html
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
