>It's a bit ironic that you underestimate PHP's devs with that sort of
>assumption, don't you think?
I do not underestimate anyone.
I just meant that those who will find class visibility "complex" may not use
namespaces at all.
But those who write a full OO code may want full OO features. Not OO t
>Hello Ron,
>
> we agreed long ago on a very easy scheme, there shall only be is-a and
>public classes.
Do you really think it makes the scheme "easier" to allow for public classes
only?
Class visibility is a common OO concept, that improves the encapsulation
of the code, and which, I'm afraid of
