Hello all,
Sorry to post here being an "outsider".
I didn't post because I know nothing about the internals, really.
However after some incomplete thought I have a not very thorough
suggestion about the ambiguity issue mentioned in the RFC wiki.
I would like to ask if this is possible.
Let me quo
"Stefan Marr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> class Talker {
> use A, B, C, D {
> B::smallTalk instead A, C, D; //to be read like: use B::smallTalk
> // instead the implementations form A, C, D
>}
> }
Excuse me for just raisin