John Coggeshall wrote:
So very -1 on anything introducing another way to print stuff. I am
however +1 on turning off everything but
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Wez,
we could however drop '<%' support and introduce '
You'll have to pry '<%' from my cold, dead hands :)
Edin
Matthew Fonda wrote:
I would like to help with documentation and contribute anything else
possible, and also I was told to request a CVS account by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spoke with him on irc, in #phpdoc.
Derek Ford
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit
forewarding a bug report{?} I recieved.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello!
I wrote an RSS parser using PHP 5.0RC1 and SimpleXML and noticed a lot
of irregularities (bugs). I'll summarize them here.
1) There is no way to know if a tag actually exists or not
$xml = simplexml_load_string('123123');
echo(c
George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Jan 18, 2004, at 5:57 PM, Jon Parise wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:22:35PM +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5
module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features.
Since some
earli
Stig S. Bakken wrote:
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 00:28, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On December 13, 2003 05:52 pm, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
I haven't denied it. That said, multibyte facility is not so fancy
as XML, but quite essential so as to enable most applications to work
well under every envir
This is highly unusual I recently started gathering people who could
implement and opinions of those who wanted or didn't want a 'with'
construct.
http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/topic11451.php
I toyed with the idea, and then when I went into core to implement it, I
became _very_ confused
Alan Knowles wrote:
How about removing the depreciated functions completely, and providing
a userside implementation of them..
include_once 'depreciated.php';
That works for functions at least.. , pass-by-ref is a bit more complex..
At least it gets the mess out of the C code, and it provides
Derek Ford wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
That's OK with me.
At 04:42 PM 11/19/2003 -0600, Derek Ford wrote:
Derek Ford wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:53 AM 11/19/2003 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I agree with --disable-deprecated, it seems to be the best
option. Do you think it
Andi Gutmans wrote:
That's OK with me.
At 04:42 PM 11/19/2003 -0600, Derek Ford wrote:
Derek Ford wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:53 AM 11/19/2003 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I agree with --disable-deprecated, it seems to be the best
option. Do you think it would be relevant to
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:53 AM 11/19/2003 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I agree with --disable-deprecated, it seems to be the best option.
Do you think it would be relevant to have a php.ini option for this?
What's the point of deprecating things if you never remove them?
Seems like an
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 07:55 PM 11/18/2003 -0500, Mike Robinson wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> On a related note, since a major PHP version is now being
> released, perhaps it is the time to finally remove old
> deprecated functionality that in many cases deprecated for
> years. I propose that
Joining the phpdoc team. General manual maintenance; fixing errors, adding new
documentation, updating old documentation, etc. Might join the Japanese translation
team as well (undecided).
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.ph
__
And - maybe Zend can help here - to enforce the
communication
of php5 and it's features (i.e. pay some good people to write an
extra-column on
zend-website, php-website and wellknow php-portals around the world,
introducing
STEP
13 matches
Mail list logo
