[PHP-DEV] Re: confirm unsubscribe from internals@lists.php.net

2013-02-04 Thread Clint Byrum
sting.com > Received: from [65.98.207.245] ([65.98.207.245:59151] > helo=xencbyrum2.srihosting.com) > by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP > id 2C/20-48414-558FF015 for ; Mon, > 04 Feb 2013 13:05:10 -0500 > Received: from fewbar.com (cpe-76-94

Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4.0 rc6 and release

2012-03-26 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Johannes Schlüter's message of Mon Mar 26 16:09:20 -0700 2012: > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:00 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > Our hands are tied, as the security team still does not feel > > comfortable shipping a PHP without Suhosin. Perhaps more can b

Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4.0 rc6 and release

2012-03-26 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from André Rømcke's message of Mon Mar 26 04:44:53 -0700 2012: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > Excerpts from Stas Malyshev's message of Thu Jan 19 16:08:28 -0800 2012: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > - According to

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL

2012-03-02 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sebastian Bergmann's message of Fri Mar 02 07:41:53 -0800 2012: > On 03/02/2012 07:34 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php53eol > > I discussed with Arne Blankerts and Stefan Priebsch over breakfast today > and Stefan had an interesting idea: why not announce (

Re: [PHP-DEV] Suhosin patch disabled by default in Debian php5 builds

2012-02-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Kiall Mac Innes's message of Sat Feb 04 09:34:44 -0800 2012: > Hi John, > > Ondřej (One of the Debian PHP maintainers) listed 5 or 6 reasons in the > initial email in this thread. > > Honestly, I can't think of a good reason for Debian or anyone else to > include 3rd party patches,

Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4.0 rc6 and release

2012-01-19 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Stas Malyshev's message of Thu Jan 19 16:08:28 -0800 2012: > Hi! > > > - According to this website there are still 94 test failures in 5.4 . > > Can you confirm all of them are minor problems? > > http://gcov.php.net/viewer.php?version=PHP_5_4 > > Most of them appear so, I'll go thr

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-11-07 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of Sun Oct 23 18:36:04 -0400 2011: > So, I've registered a blueprint for UDS here: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-php54 > > There's no guarantee we will be able to fit it in, so make sure to > subscribe to it if you are interest

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [php-maint] [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-24 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from devis's message of Mon Oct 24 15:18:14 -0700 2011: > Hi, > > I have always disliked the lack of modern packages on Debian/Ubuntu distros, > I feel like minor are misused as major versions, with an exaggerated fear to > upgrade. It's like building web sites for IE6 because people are

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-23 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Hannes Magnusson's message of Sat Oct 22 04:03:50 -0700 2011: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS > > release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be su

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.9 and is_a changes

2011-10-21 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by Canonical for 5 years. Because of this, I really want to ship a version of PHP that has an is_a() behavior that will be consistent with any future 5.3.x rele

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_a() - again - a better fix

2011-09-22 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Kalle Sommer Nielsen's message of Thu Sep 22 08:03:19 -0700 2011: > Hi > > 2011/9/22 Daniel Convissor : > > Breaking PHP for untold thousands upon thousands of applications created > > over the past nine years is a FAR bigger problem for our image. > > While don't like the change du

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: is_a() - again - a better fix

2011-09-21 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Pierre Joye's message of Wed Sep 21 08:01:48 -0700 2011: > 2011/9/21 Johannes Schlüter : > > > Exactly. (while I, at this time, won't argue which behavior is more > > "correct") changing this in the first place was wrong. Changing it back > > is wrong again. We have two versions out

Re: [PHP-DEV] Change Request: Make PDO default to not emulate prepared statements for MySQL

2011-04-30 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Rasmus Lerdorf's message of Sat Apr 30 10:53:30 -0700 2011: > On 04/30/2011 10:36 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> Do you realize why we did this in the first place? The common versions > >> of MySQL in use out there are not very clever when it comes to the > >> native prepar

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE : Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Add option to disable POST data processing

2010-12-08 Thread Clint Byrum
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:49 +, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:10:30 -0000, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 01:11 +, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > >> > >> For instance, current scripts can, in POST requests, read any number of

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE : Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Add option to disable POST data processing

2010-12-08 Thread Clint Byrum
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 01:11 +, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:45:56 -, Tjerk Meesters > wrote: > > > Don't have much knowledge about the internal workings of the engine, but > > I'm wondering if it's possible to apply "lazy loading" to the $_POST > > variable, so that

Re: [PHP-DEV] git anyone?

2010-11-28 Thread Clint Byrum
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 16:26 +, Lester Caine wrote: > At the end of the day however it probably has nothing to do with which DVCS > is > used for master copies. The interoperability now available does mean that we > can > safely ignore any 'choice' and simply use our own preference locally :

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 alpha

2010-11-01 Thread Clint Byrum
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:32 -0700, Derick Rethans wrote: > Hi, > > we're a bit further along now; and with the typehinting resolved > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.devel/62298/focus=62858) I want > to start started with PHP 5.4 with the first alpha on Wednesday, > November 24th. There

Re: [PHP-DEV] Sessions lock - not using memcached?

2010-09-26 Thread Clint Byrum
On Sep 26, 2010, at 1:10 AM, ROZE Samuel wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working with sessions in my PHP applications. My pages can take long time > to be executed (~500ms) and I've simultaneous requests for the same session > (Ajax requests). My problem is that I close sessions at the end of my PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Annoucing PHP 5.4 Alpha 1

2010-08-10 Thread Clint Byrum
On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Michael Wallner wrote: > On 08/11/2010 12:03 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: >> Greetings hackers >> >> I spoke with Derick today, and we both agreed on releasing an alpha of >> PHP 5.4 to show the public what we have been working since 5.3. We are >> going to relea

Re: [PHP-DEV] IMAP patches from kolab -- can we get these merged?

2010-07-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Thanks everyone for having a look at this. I'll track the status in the bug from here on. On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Yesterday I was talking with one of my Colleagues about the Kolab > project's use of some of the newer features of IMAP, notably, a

[PHP-DEV] IMAP patches from kolab -- can we get these merged?

2010-07-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Yesterday I was talking with one of my Colleagues about the Kolab project's use of some of the newer features of IMAP, notably, annotations and myrights. It turns out Kolab ships a patched PHP to do this properly, and they've been maintaining these patches for quite some time. In fact, they're up