> I have posted a new RFC at this link https://wiki.php.net/rfc/empty_function
> where I suggested some improvements to the standard built-in empty()
> function and provided a number of examples.
Is your "is_empty()" function equivalent to something like:
function is_empty($param = null)
{
re
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:16 PM Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:18 PM Brady Wetherington
> wrote:
>>
>> >>> …It's been merged to master, so you could stand up a build now and point
>> >>> to the many deprecation warnings you're expecting. I'm not saying send
>> >>> PRs to fi
>>> …It's been merged to master, so you could stand up a build now and point to
>>> the many deprecation warnings you're expecting. I'm not saying send PRs to
>>> fix them all, just show real impact rather than theoretical guessing. …
>
>
> That’s a totally fair ask, and I’ll try and get that do
>
> …It's been merged to master, so you could stand up a build now and point
>> to the many deprecation warnings you're expecting. I'm not saying send PRs
>> to fix them all, just show real impact rather than theoretical guessing. …
>
>
That’s a totally fair ask, and I’ll try and get that done and
> > That's 1.5 million hours, which is 171 developer-years.
>
> If we're going to imagine numbers; there are 6 million PHP developers
> in the world*. If on average they each lose just 1 hour per year by
> making typos and accidentally creating a properties dynamically,
> that's 6 million hours, or
> This is a little bit overly dramatic. This isn't such a huge change that
> would affect 50% of existing projects. It's likely to affect a small number
> of projects in a very limited way.
> It's also not true that developers will slap #[AllowDynamicProperties] on
> every class. That would impl
Sorry for the 11th hour chime-in, but I wanted to add some context
about this proposed change, and how it would likely affect our project
and many others. I know the prospect of opt-in was already addressed,
but I wanted to talk about what our experience would be here. (We make
Snipe-IT, which is o