On 30 May 2025, at 21:29, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2025 19:21:08 BST, Alwin Garside wrote:
>> In the example above, I image calling or extending the `Foo::bar()` method
>> from somewhere outside the `Acme` namespace would trigger an E_USER_WARNING
>&g
On 30 May 2025, at 18:38, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2025 08:57:34 BST, Rob Landers wrote:
>>
>> I’m starting to think that maybe modules might be a bad idea; or at least,
>> class/module visibility.
>>
>> As an anecdote, I was looking to extract a protobuf encoding library fr
Hey all,
It took me a while, but I'm finally caught up with this thread, and would like
to give my 2 cents.
On 25 May 2025, at 23:17, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
>
> On 25/05/2025 21:28, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> Even if we develop some way such that in Foo.php, loading the class
>> \Beep\Boo
On 24 May 2025, at 20:48, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2025, at 19:37, Daniel Kesselberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm happy to share my first RFC :) It proposes adding a small function
>> to retrieve the number of available processors; a feature that's
>> commonly found i
Hi Anton,
> On 23 May 2025, at 03:24, Anton Smirnov wrote:
>
>> Moreover, what if I don't need a variadic parameter, but would like to
>> declare that the function's interface requires named arguments (because I
>> don't want to be tied to locking parameters to specific positions).
>
> If you
On 1 Mar 2025, at 08:37, Rob Landers wrote:
>
> Hi Alwin,
>
> You may be interested in http://wiki.php.net/rfc/records, whose goal from the
> beginning was a new type that behaved like arrays (value semantics, copy on
> write) as well as the ability to attach behavior to them.
>
> I’ve since
On 1 Mar 2025, at 00:28, Larry Garfield wrote:
> Your friends are correct. Arrays in PHP are an awful thing. They are twice
> as memory hungry as objects, they provide no static guarantees, and they're a
> security hole waiting to happen (and has in fact happened).
>
> And since PHP 8.0, *we
On 1 Mar 2025, at 00:28, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I would love to try and push this idea forward – either by
>> contacting Kacpar, or writing my own RFC – and have a shot at implementing a
>> proof of concept, but first I would like to get a feel for whether this
>> proposal would fin
> On 28 Feb 2025, at 23:57, Bilge wrote:
>
> Generics
Yes, I am aware that generics are being worked on. However, generics wouldn't
provide structural interfaces for arrays. At most it would provide a way to
infer/define generic types for array keys and/or values.
I guess I should've provi
P, and
perhaps read the draft written by Kacper Donat [1] for a much more eloquent
example of what I'm trying to propose here.
Thank you all very much in advance.
Kindest regards,
Alwin Garside
[1] https://hackmd.io/@kadet/php-rfc-shapes
10 matches
Mail list logo
