On Friday 27 June 2008, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> 1) Fixed ref/noref issues
Works for me. See attached test 11.
Gesundheit
Wag
--
For sale: baby shoes, never worn.
- flash fiction by Hemingway
--TEST--
Closure test: Closure calls itself
--SKIPIF--
--FILE--
--EXPECT--
3
2
1
0
--TEST--
Closure
On Friday 27 June 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I am not sure I like the idea of explicit $this.
> [..] If we ever discover this is a huge issue
Implicit unoptimized $this is never going to be a "huge issue", because it is
not badly broken, only sublty.
My crystal ball tells me that the following i
> Yes, you're right. My solution for this would be:
I can't get this to work, it segfaults for me now when I try to use closures.
Maybe I screwed something up, this is my first Zend-Engine-hackery.
As you agree that the current behaviour is kinda weird, just put the fix in
the next wave of patch
On Friday 27 June 2008, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I lean towards the use(...) syntax.
Me too.
> > * I provided a patch variant that only stores $this if $this is
> > explicitely used inside a closure [..]
>
> Safest not to take shortcuts. You get yourself into trouble with things
> which will s
> * I added tests (Zend/tests/closures_*.phpt) that ensure the correct
> behaviour of closures.
I'd like to propose an additional test to ensure closures can all themselves:
Expected output:
3
2
1
3
I see exactly one problem with the patch, which is that the above script
shouldn't work wi
> I think allowing globals/lexicals to be passed by value doesn't make
> much sense, you could just use a regular parameter for that.
No, that is highly inconvenient when you're doing actual functional
programming with higher order functions and everything.
$i = 1;
$incrementor = lambda ($x) lex
On Friday 20 June 2008, Chris Stockton wrote:
> No one at all thinks:
> function foo($x, $y) use $a, $b, $c {
> }
>
> Looks awkward and a little out of place
It certainly is new and different in PHP, but I don't see a reason why this
should be hard to get used to.
Also, it works for Java exceptio
On Friday 20 June 2008, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > function ($x, $y) use ($a, $b, &$c) {};
>
> I am not sure if "use" is the clearest word to use there (wouldn't lexical
> there make more sense?)
I agree. "use" for both namespaces and closures may not be a good idea.
Otherwise +1 to this syntax for
On Friday 20 June 2008, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> * A closure must be able to call itself recursively (via a
> higher-order function typically)
> [Check, since you can use variable you assigned closure to inside the
> closure, if I understand correctly]
This is a matter of implementation rather
First, a comment from haskell-land:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-June/044533.html
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-June/thread.html#44379
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Frankly, I don't really see a problem with using references. It fit
10 matches
Mail list logo
