t your (non-Windows) prompt you get a nice little
> description of what it does.
>
> -Rasmus
>
--20cf307d046c3ddbde049fcb0b8f--
--
Alban Leroux
s...@paradoxal.org
Web developper
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
cost, that we gain.
If we want this functionality, then Mathieu Suen's idea is better IMHO:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg46764.html
eg. (new Foo())->bar()
Tyrael
Yes my only possible objection is that's less readable.
--
Alban Leroux
s...@paradoxal.org
W
oblem i see, is could be a name conflict like :
function Foo() {
// ...
}
class Foo() {
public __create() {
// ...
}
}
Foo(); // Instanciate the class or call the function ?
I hope this idea can help/inspire you.
Regards,
--
Alban Leroux
s...@paradoxal.org
Web developper
--
PHP Internals - PHP
tant should not be incremented
but should
be shifted left.
After the manner which is implemented don't affect me. Can be a " enum
" keyword
or a stuff like " iota ".
--
Alban Leroux
s...@paradoxal.org
Web developper
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ue, or
literal, and generate a notice for the developer to change the const to
literal for gaining performance.
What do you think?
Tyrael
That's could be very useful to define flag, something like that :
class foo {
const CASE_1 = 1 << 1;
const CASE_2 = 1 << 2;
CONST VALUES.
-1 but yes for matematical (or logical) operation like this :
class foo
{
const OPTION_1 = 1 << 0;
const OPTION_2 = 1 << 1;
const OPTION_3 = 1 << 2;
const OPTION_4 = 1 << 3;
}
4. PARAMETER ORDER.
+1
Thank you for your time,
7;foo')?:42;
>
> Simple and clean.
>
> -Rasmus
Yes, as you say, simple and clean !
Have I miss something like that in php ?
--
Alban Leroux
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
o'] ?= 'default';
I am aware that I am repeating myself and that I seem insistant. It is
difficult to express ideas clearly when one is not very comfortable with
English and I apologize for that :)
--
Alban Leroux s...@paradoxal.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Le Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:48:10 +0100, Lukas Kahwe Smith a écrit :
> On 21.11.2009, at 06:12, Alban wrote:
>
>> This is not a big problem but if a solution exists, this would be so
>> cool ! Especialy when we have to check existance of twenty or more key
>> in array. Code
Le Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:28:39 -0600, Larry Garfield a écrit :
> On Friday 20 November 2009 11:12:29 pm Alban wrote:
>
>> This is not a big problem but if a solution exists, this would be so
>> cool ! Especialy when we have to check existance of twenty or more key
>> in
ar($var, $default) { return ((isset($var)) ? $var :
$default); }
So is it possible to make a little improvement on this operator or
introduce a new operator or a core function which do that ? What's your
feeling about it ?
--
Alban Leroux s...@paradoxal.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Le Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:06:19 +0100, Mathieu Suen a écrit :
> Alban a écrit :
>> Le Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:24:01 +, Jared Williams a écrit :
>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Robert Lemke [mailto:rob...@typo3.org] Sent: 18 November 2009
>
hich is allready created.
// you register the service
Services::register('databaseConnexion', new databaseConnexionFactory
('mysql', array('server', 'database', 'user', 'password')));
// and call it
$db = Services::load('databaseConnexion');
How PHP should treat the singleton ? getInstance() is just a convention.
Create a service mechanism directly in php implies that php implements
singleton model too.
--
Alban Leroux s...@paradoxal.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
istence reason :
try
{
include 'file';
// if we are sure about data sort in get_included_files, just do :
$fullFileName = array_pop(get_included_files());
// ...
}
catch(phpParseIncludeException $e)
{
// ...
}
catch(missingIncludeException $e)
{
// ...
}
catch(includeException $e)
{
// ...
}
regards,
Alban Leroux
s...@paradoxal.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Le Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:35:45 +0200, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
> I just realized we don't link to that function from the simplexml docs.
>
> I'll add some "see also" links and add an "errors" section mentioning it
> too.
>
> -Hannes
Thank you for the documentation :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru
>Le Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:48:49 +0200, Hannes Magnusson a écrit :
>
> Are you intentionally ignoring what I've said previously in the thread?
> Please stop using SimpleXML as an example. You do not need @. libxml_use_internal_errors(true);
> [...]
>
> Again. The examples you are looking for are ne
Le Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:23:21 +0200, user a écrit :
> I published a (work in progress) RFC today about replacing certain
> errors with exceptions. I know that there already was something similiar
> on the php6dev blog, but this is not completly the same, so awating your
> comments:
>
> http://wiki
Le Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:16:51 +0100, Alain Williams a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:57:22AM -0400, Alban wrote:
>> Le Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:23:24 +0100, Alain Williams a écrit :
>>
>> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:45:55AM -0400, Alban wrote:
>> >> Hello
Le Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:23:24 +0100, Alain Williams a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:45:55AM -0400, Alban wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I don't understand why you focus on " Strict / Weak " question.
>
> It is really about:
>
> * type ch
Le Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:11:31 +0200, Geoffrey Sneddon a écrit :
> On 9 Jul 2009, at 18:20, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
>
>> On 09.07.2009, at 10:39, Paul Biggar wrote:
>>
I think we can take Lukas's RFC and either change it or write
something
based on it for weak typing only. If pe
20 matches
Mail list logo
