ind,
though right now) and because "fallthrough" is kinda hard word for non-native
speakers.
"pass" exists in Python. https://docs.python.org/2.0/ref/pass.html
>> It might be not useful enough to justify a BC break.
That was my intention, to find more value in a new
27;m just throwing some ideas to consider, I don't pretend they are good. Adding
a no-op
keyword does not make much sense to me. It might be not useful enough to
justify a BC
break. You could call it "noop" as well.
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C'
ould be a veto which would rise the bar
for an RFC to
pass.
ps. first time poster, but I couldn't sit quiet seeing what's going on on the
list recently.
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
Kolab Groupware Developer [ht
