Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 06.06.2007 11:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why?
The behavior is quite clear - if the objects are instances of the
same class, we have no other way to compare them but to compare
their properties, this also applies to properties' properties and
properties'
Paweł Stradomski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear internals,
I stumbled upon the following odd error message from PHP which I was not
expecting.
function test(){
echo $this == $this->c1->c2?'equals':'not equals'; // Somehow this
Use === (shallow t
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 06.06.2007 01:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c2 = $c2;
}
}
class class2{
public $c1;
function setC1($c1){
$this->c1 = $c1;
}
function test(){
echo $this == $this->c1->c2?'equals':'not equals'; // Somehow
this if
Dear internals,
I stumbled upon the following odd error message from PHP which I was not
expecting.
Here is a small example that triggered the error with 5.2.2, 5.2.3 and a
php5.2-200706052030 snapshot.
c2 = $c2;
}
}
class class2{
public $c1;
function setC1($c1){
$this->c1 = $c1;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow thats fast!
On my machine i get these results:
Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI)
require_once - 1.7735 sec
myrequire_once - 1.0973 sec
I made two benchmarks one with relative paths and one with full paths.
The full paths:
Here the benchmarks with relative paths
Wow thats fast!
On my machine i get these results:
Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI)
require_once - 1.7735 sec
myrequire_once - 1.0973 sec
is that with the sources i just send?
Am 24.04.2007, 12:10 Uhr, schrieb Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 04/24/2007 01:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
when testing speed of includes and requires i found that "require_once"
seems to be very slow in comparison to "require". Even worse
"require_once" seems to be slower than a php function "myrequire_once".
This is true not only for cli but also when using apc or eAccelerator.
Hello everyone
in version the 5.2.1 i get strange results when using the reference
operator on arrays. When writing a function "a" with call by reference:
function &a(&$anArray) { return $anArray; }
and another function "b":
function b($anArray) { return $anArray; }
Then on my machine it take
ptions the way you did, and in ADDITION you can
write cleaner code which doesn't rely on exceptions.
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:31:58 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why not just returning null when a method does not exist?
&g
Why not just returning null when a method does not exist?
Actually CALLING a non-existing method should be treated as an error...
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:47:26 +0100, Christian Schneider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > You assume wrong. My point is that
nixes
exec(...);
}
else if (pid == -1)
{
// fail
return -1;
}
else
{
return pid;
}
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:52:41 -0500, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:28:03 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The bottom lin
elf, but I'm not familiar with the
zend api and php source base yet. some day I will...
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:29:18 -0500, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:47:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately no.
Unfortunately no.
On win32 for instance, fork() doesn't exist at all.
There is a need for a cross-platform unified interface.
P.S. please always "reply to all"
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:38:41 -0600, Jeremy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I am following yo
PHP has system() and shell_execute(), but how about spawn() ?
Currently we can only create an asynchronous process only with
proc_open() or popen(), and then I have to track the pipe(s).
It would be great to "exec and let go" the process.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
Hi Wez,
Have you got a chance to look this over?
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:27:47 -0500, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can see the need for this kind of thing, but I'm not so sure about
> the implementation.
> It's also important to consider backward compatibil
Heh, ActiveState did it after they received funding from Microsoft.
Guess that's not gonna happen with PHP. Ever.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:25:09 -0500, Wez Furlong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:05:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrot
ctual*
fork() on win32 is a bit beyond php development.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:02:01 +0100, Aaron Wormus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can't it be emulated?
The *concept* doesn't exist on Windo
the trick.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:58:39 +0100 (CET), Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Can't it be emulated?
>
> The *concept* doesn't exist on Windows, so no.
>
>
>
> Derick
>
>
Can't it be emulated?
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:53:53 +0100 (CET), Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Any chance to see fork() support for Win32 in the near future?
>
> No, win32 has no such concept.
>
Any chance to see fork() support for Win32 in the near future?
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:48:14 +0100 (CET), Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, overight wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > What about fork() in php ?
>
> http
Here's a patch, which logic is pretty simple:
1st try to invoke without CMD.EXE (this will work for executable
files), and if that fails - invoke with CMD.EXE.
Shouldn't be too much of a burden for the CPU, but saves memory.
It also allows to kill processes later, which wouldn't happen if
CMD.EXE
No no, I've checked the documentation.
It seems that CloseHandle() is still required after terminating a process.
Although MS documentation for it's own products is not always 100% accurate.
I suggest checking this impirically...
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:54:08 -0500, Wez Furlong <[EM
f the home
connections are).
The major problem is resuming an interrupted upload back where it
started, and pure PHP solution won't help here...
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:54:26 +, Curt Zirzow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Thus wrote Klaus Reimer:
> > Joe Orton wrote:
> >
Hi Guys,
PHP_FUNCTION(proc_close) doesn't have a call to
CloseHandle(proc->child), to close the process handle.
This is causing a handle leak on Windows, and eventually brings the
whole OS to it's knees.
Here's the fixed code snippet (there's a DIFF at the end of the file):
- cut her
0 Nov 2004 19:08:18 +0300, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:49:45 +0200
>
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > PHP_FUNCTION(proc_close) doesn't have a call to
>
Dear PayPal customer,
It has come to our attention that when logging into PayPal,
you or somebody else have made several login attempts and reached
your daily attempt limit. As an additional security measure your
access to PayPal will be limited in a 24-hour period if you do not
verify your id
> Every tried the php-documentation? ;)
Oooops :) my fault...
Thanks will work it througth
Christian
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
sometimes I miss some functions in PHP. Most of the times I write this
function in PHP and put this function(s) in a extra file and include this
file in every project I have.
Now I want to write those functions I have collected over years in C.
1. for training
2. that i don't need to inc
resend due to 30k issue.
Attached is the patch (ap2.txt) that prevents AP2 handler from constantly
flushing the data as soon as it is passed. As you can see in the benchmarks
this more the doubles the performance when many writes occur. I am hoping Ian
can explain the need for this flush, sinc
29 matches
Mail list logo
