Hi Anton,
> On 23 May 2025, at 03:24, Anton Smirnov wrote:
>
>> Moreover, what if I don't need a variadic parameter, but would like to
>> declare that the function's interface requires named arguments (because I
>> don't want to be tied to locking parameters to specific positions).
>
> If you
On Thu, May 22, 2025, at 8:53 PM, Anton Smirnov wrote:
> Hi Dmitriy
>
> On 22/05/2025 12:24, Dmitry Derepko wrote:
> > I'm aware that Larry Garfield previously proposed a similar feature
> > several years ago, though it unfortunately didn't pass the voting stage.
> > I would like to respectfully
On 2025-05-23 13:24, Anton Smirnov wrote:
Hi Alwin
Please explain the syntax you propose about this part:
> That way, you could even make it so that only specific arguments are
required to be named
because I see only 2 ways to call it:
#[AllArgsAreNamed] function f (/* ... */)
and
