Hi everyone,
I've been working on a new RFC which proposes changing the default value
for the zend.exception_ignore_args INI setting from Off to On.
The intent of this change is to make PHP installations safer by default and
prevent the accidental release of sensitive information in stack traces.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:05 PM Daniel Scherzer <
daniel.e.scher...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to start discussion on a new RFC about allowing `never` for
> parameter types when declaring a method.
>
> * RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/never-parameters-v2
> * Implementation: htt
On 4/8/25 10:53 AM, Daikaras wrote:
> On 4/5/2025 6:51 PM, Niels Dossche wrote:
>> Hi internals
>>
>> I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Niels
>
>
> -1 because returning `null` for empty array
On 4/8/25 8:46 PM, Claude Pache wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that this argument is not convincing, and even counterproductive:
>
> * NULL is a rare legitimate value, so the potential for clashing is low
>
> First, it says that it is a “rare” legitimate value, which one can disagree
> with. (I do di
On 4/8/25 10:53 AM, Daikaras wrote:
> On 4/5/2025 6:51 PM, Niels Dossche wrote:
>> Hi internals
>>
>> I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Niels
>
>
> -1 because returning `null` for empty array
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025, at 10:51 AM, Niels Dossche wrote:
> Hi internals
>
> I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
>
> Kind regards
> Niels
To add another argument: the reset() workaround doesn't work with a readonly
arra
> Le 5 avr. 2025 à 17:51, Niels Dossche a écrit :
>
> Hi internals
>
> I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
>
> Kind regards
> Niels
Hi,
I think that this argument is not convincing, and even counterproductive:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 at 18:38, Levi Morrison wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 9:51 AM Niels Dossche wrote:
> >
> > Hi internals
> >
> > I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Niels
>
> I dislik
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 02:48, Ayesh Karunaratne wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:05 AM Bilge wrote:
> > ... [snip] I suggest first proving there is a
> > legitimate need.
>
> I did a quick GitHub search for a common pattern of accessing an array
> value by using the `array_key_first` and `arr
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025, at 10:53, Daikaras wrote:
> On 4/5/2025 6:51 PM, Niels Dossche wrote:
> > Hi internals
> >
> > I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Niels
>
>
> -1 because returning `n
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 9:51 AM Niels Dossche wrote:
>
> Hi internals
>
> I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
>
> Kind regards
> Niels
I dislike all the functions where `null` is a valid value, which can
also be confu
On 4/5/2025 6:51 PM, Niels Dossche wrote:
Hi internals
I'm opening the discussion for the RFC "array_first() and array_last()".
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_first_last
Kind regards
Niels
-1 because returning `null` for empty arrays is still wrong. Whatever
similar behavior exists should b
12 matches
Mail list logo
