Hi
Am 2025-02-24 15:05, schrieb Hammed Ajao:
What's wrong with declaring all the methods as final eg.
https://github.com/lnear-dev/ada-url/blob/main/ada_url.stub.php
It is not possible to construct a subclass in a generic fashion, because
you don't know the constructor’s signature and you als
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:44 PM Jorg Sowa wrote:
> I must agree with Kamil. I don't see practical benefits of this feature
> that would surpass the implications it has for the language. We already
> have static analysis handling such cases and it can be extended even to
> non-pure functions. Mor
Le lun. 24 févr. 2025 à 14:57, Gina P. Banyard a écrit :
> On Monday, 24 February 2025 at 11:08, Nicolas Grekas <
> nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing a push to make the classes final. Please don't!
> This would badly break the open/closed principle to me.
>
> When shipping a new
Am 24.02.2025 um 14:57 schrieb Marco Pivetta:
The `DateTimeImmutable` type should've been `final` from the start: it is
trivial to declare a userland interface, and then use the
`DateTimeImmutable` type as an implementation detail of a userland-
provided interface.
+1
What's wrong with declaring all the methods as final eg.
https://github.com/lnear-dev/ada-url/blob/main/ada_url.stub.php
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 7:00 a.m. Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> On Monday, 24 February 2025 at 11:08, Nicolas Grekas <
> nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing a push to
On Monday, 24 February 2025 at 11:08, Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> I'm seeing a push to make the classes final. Please don't!
> This would badly break the open/closed principle to me.
>
> When shipping a new class, one ships two things: a behavior and a type. The
> behavior is what some want to clos
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 14:45, Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
>
>
> Am 2025-02-24 12:08, schrieb Nicolas Grekas:
>> > The situation I'm telling about is when one will accept an argument
>> > described as
>> > function (\Uri\WhatWg\Url $url)
>> >
>> > If the Url class is final, this signature means only one
Am 2025-02-24 12:08, schrieb Nicolas Grekas:
> > The situation I'm telling about is when one will accept an argument
> > described as
> > function (\Uri\WhatWg\Url $url)
> >
> > If the Url class is final, this signature means only one possible
> > implementation can ever be passed: the native one.
Hi
Am 2025-02-24 12:08, schrieb Nicolas Grekas:
The situation I'm telling about is when one will accept an argument
described as
function (\Uri\WhatWg\Url $url)
If the Url class is final, this signature means only one possible
implementation can ever be passed: the native one. Composition canno
Hi,
Thanks for all the efforts making this RFC happen, it'll be a game changer
in the domain!
I'm seeing a push to make the classes final. Please don't!
This would badly break the open/closed principle to me.
When shipping a new class, one ships two things: a behavior and a type. The
behavior is
Hi
Am 2025-02-24 10:18, schrieb Ignace Nyamagana Butera:
5 - Can the returned array from __debugInfo be used in a "normal"
method like `toComponents` naming can be changed/improve to ease
migration from parse_url or is this left for userland library ?
I would prefer not expose this functional
Hi
Am 2025-02-23 18:57, schrieb Paul M. Jones:
In earlier discussions on the [Server-Side Request and Response
objects](https://externals.io/message/108436) RFC and the [after-action
sumamry](https://externals.io/message/109563), one of the common
non-technical objections was that it would bet
On 21/02/2025 13:06, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
Am 2025-02-16 23:01, schrieb Máté Kocsis:
I only harp on the WhatWG spec so much because for many people this
will
be the only one they are aware of, if they are aware of any spec at
all,
and this is a sizable vector of attack targeting servers fro
Hi
Am 2025-02-23 18:47, schrieb Juris Evertovskis:
As those are URI validation errors, maybe something like
`Uri\WhatWg\ValidationError` would be both less clashy and less
redundant?
I like that suggestion.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Hi
Am 2025-02-23 18:30, schrieb Gina P. Banyard:
2.
I don't really understand how the UninitializedUriException exception
can be thrown?
Is it somehow possible to create an instance of a URI without
initializing it?
It's mentioned in the RFC (it was not yet, when I read through the RFC):
Th
15 matches
Mail list logo
