On 2025-02-13 00:52, Volker Dusch wrote:
b) Naming of the attribute
Nobody mentioned this on the list, but before opening a vote we'd like
to heard if the attribute name makes sense to you.
On this, it could be spelled #[\MustUse], rather than phrase it as a
negative.
I must agree with Kamil. I don't see practical benefits of this feature
that would surpass the implications it has for the language. We already
have static analysis handling such cases and it can be extended even to
non-pure functions. Moreover, syntax (void) adds additional complexity to
beginners
I hereby open the voting on static-aviz properties:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static-aviz
The vote will be open until 26 February.
--
Larry Garfield
la...@garfieldtech.com
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025, at 5:52 AM, Volker Dusch wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:12 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Volker and I would like to start discussion on our RFC to allow "Marking
>> return values as important (#[\NoDiscard])".
>>
>> Please find the following resources for your reference:
>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025, at 17:43, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-02-12 15:07, schrieb Kamil Tekiela:
> > I'd be honest, I have a very negative attitude towards this proposal
> > and I'd be voting against it. It seems to me like it's creating a
> > problem and then trying to find a solution
Hi
Am 2025-02-12 15:07, schrieb Kamil Tekiela:
I'd be honest, I have a very negative attitude towards this proposal
and I'd be voting against it. It seems to me like it's creating a
problem and then trying to find a solution for it.
Given that even Rust with a modern stdlib and ergonomic langu
Hi Tim and Volker,
I'd be honest, I have a very negative attitude towards this proposal
and I'd be voting against it. It seems to me like it's creating a
problem and then trying to find a solution for it.
A return value is always supposed to be used. If some API is returning
a value that can be s
On 29/01/2025 15:12, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
Volker and I would like to start discussion on our RFC to allow
"Marking return values as important (#[\NoDiscard])".
Please find the following resources for your reference:
- RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/marking_return_value_as_important
- Imple
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:12 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Volker and I would like to start discussion on our RFC to allow "Marking
> return values as important (#[\NoDiscard])".
>
> Please find the following resources for your reference:
>
> - RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/marking_return_value_as_im
