On Sun, Feb 2, 2025, at 7:40 AM, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi Dmitrii
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 1:05 PM Dmitry Derepko wrote:
>>
>> I’m thinking about making match (true) and switch (true) be more lightweight
>> by removing the subject “(true)” and making matching “true condition” by
>> default.
>>
Hi Dmitrii
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 2:36 PM Dmitry Derepko wrote:
>
> I had similar idea to make `break`, `continue` and `return` be expressions
> instead of statements to simplify almost the same cases as Robert described
> above.
>
> Grammar corrections in the PR. https://github.com/php/php-src
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, at 15:35, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Volker and I would like to start discussion on our RFC to support "First
> Class Callables in constant expressions".
>
> Please find the following resources for your reference:
>
> - RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fcc_in_const_expr
>
Hi Dmitrii
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 1:05 PM Dmitry Derepko wrote:
>
> I’m thinking about making match (true) and switch (true) be more lightweight
> by removing the subject “(true)” and making matching “true condition” by
> default.
> So $var = match (true) { … } can be used as $var = match { … }
Hi
Am 2025-01-31 23:36, schrieb Larry Garfield:
Purely out of curiosity and for educational value, what was so
complicated about it? I would have expected it to be straightforward.
FCC internally are effectively treated as function calls with a funny
parameter list. This means that all valid
> On Jan 25, 2024, at 12:16 PM, Robert Landers wrote:
>
> Hello internals,
>
> Now that throwing is an expression, it allows for some very concise
> programming. What are your thoughts on making a break/continue into an
> expression as well?
Hi!
I had similar idea to make `break`, `continue`
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 2:26 PM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
> `break` and `continue` should be bundled together, because they are so
> similar. I'd say that a single RFC (and thus a single discussion for all
> of them) is fine and that RFC can then contain two primary 2/3 majority
> votes for "Should re
Hi Dmitry
Please do not "top-post" on this list. Put your reply *below* the
message you are quoting and ideally cut the quoted parts to the minimum.
See below like I do:
Am 2025-02-02 10:28, schrieb Dmitry Derepko:
If so, one common RFC or each for each operator: return, break,
continue?
`
Thank you, Ilija. I really appreciate it.
Could you please advise do I need to create RFC or it’s better do to it after
solving technical issues?
If so, one common RFC or each for each operator: return, break, continue?
I’d also like to see all this problems by myself and I have a question. Is
