On Fri, Jan 31, 2025, at 5:03 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-01-31 00:58, schrieb Larry Garfield:
>> I don't know how to interpret the radio silence from the list, but this
>> seems like an obvious and good follow-on to the previous RFC and has my
>> support.
>
> We also interpreted th
Hi Dmitrii
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 3:10 PM Dmitry Derepko wrote:
>
> I’m looking for way to gain some Karma to create an RFC.
> I’ve already made first implementation and shared it:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17647
>
> I can make 3 different RFC to discuss each change separately, let
Posted to Github: https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/17661
>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 4:06 PM Arkadiy Kulev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> This wouldn't really work because FPM does not control the script during
execution and would have to check it out after each allocation which is not
really viable.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback! I agree that m
Hi!
> This wouldn't really work because FPM does not control the script during
>>> execution and would have to check it out after each allocation which is not
>>> really viable.
>>>
>>
>>>
>> Thanks for the feedback! I agree that monitoring memory usage after each
>> allocation would be infeasibl
Hi!
I’m looking for way to gain some Karma to create an RFC.
I’ve already made first implementation and shared it:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17647
I can make 3 different RFC to discuss each change separately, let me know if
it’s necessary.
--
Best regards,
Dmitrii Derepko.
Hi
Am 2025-01-30 18:48, schrieb Claude Pache:
BTW, the RFC says that introducing the `(void)` cast is a backward
compatible change, which is incorrect; see: https://3v4l.org/iN7OY
:-| Thank you for pointing that out. We've adjusted the “Backward
Incompatible Changes” section accordingly and
Hi
Am 2025-01-31 00:58, schrieb Larry Garfield:
I don't know how to interpret the radio silence from the list, but this
seems like an obvious and good follow-on to the previous RFC and has my
support.
We also interpreted the lack of responses as “this is an obvious
follow-up and I don't have
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 at 01:59, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, at 8:35 AM, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Volker and I would like to start discussion on our RFC to support "First
> > Class Callables in constant expressions".
> >
> > Please find the following resources for your r
>
>
> To be honest, I haven't seen a 'slow' memory leak in a long time -- except
> when using fgetcsv which has had a reported memory leak since ~2012
> somewhere on the old bug tracker. (I lost the link to it and don't even
> remember how to get to the tracker or if it still exists.) I haven't
> c
Hi,
> This wouldn't really work because FPM does not control the script during
>> execution and would have to check it out after each allocation which is not
>> really viable.
>>
>
> Thanks for the feedback! I agree that monitoring memory usage after each
> allocation would be infeasible. However
11 matches
Mail list logo