On 07/01/2025 19:49, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> I wouldn't necessarily call this a workaround, but more of a missed
> optimization (one branch for each static property write that is
> unlikely to mispredict). If you wish, I can have a look at separating
> cache slots. This may lead to a slowdown due to
Hi Niels
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 7:37 PM Niels Dossche wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2025 00:14, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static-aviz
> I'm not sure how I feel about this.
> The current implementation actually uses a workaround because otherwise it
> interferes with cache s
On 04/01/2025 00:14, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> Static property asymmetric visibility was left out of the original RFC,
>> because it seemed like it would be hard and of little use. Turns out,
>> Ilija found a way to make it easy. (Ilija
