On Mon, 14/10/2024 at 06:01, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024, at 9:37 PM, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
>
>
> > First of all, I have already agreed above that PHP does not have a BC
> > break here. Now we are discussing the potential problems in the PHP
> > ecosystem and how they could b
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024, at 9:37 PM, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
> First of all, I have already agreed above that PHP does not have a BC
> break here. Now we are discussing the potential problems in the PHP
> ecosystem and how they could be mitigated.
Ilija and I have discussed this issue a bit.
The
On Mon, 14/10/2024 05:01, Jordan LeDoux :
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 5:03 PM Valentin Udaltsov
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 01:28, Jordan LeDoux :
>> > Backwards compatible has never, in any work I've done through my entire
>> > career, meant something like "if you take old code an
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 5:03 PM Valentin Udaltsov <
udaltsov.valen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 01:28, Jordan LeDoux :
> > Backwards compatible has never, in any work I've done through my entire
> career, meant something like "if you take old code and then update it to
> the new v
On Mon, 14/10/2024 04:07, Bilge wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2024 01:02, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
> > The problem is that in practice most of the PHP libraries consider
> > themselves to be compatible with newer PHP versions.
> >
> > For instance, Symfony PropertyInfo uses `"php": ">=8.2"` constraint in
>
Hi, internals.
I creating grapheme_levenshtein function that measure levenshtein
distance based on grapheme cluster in Unicode.
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/16428
RFC is here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_levenshtein
I want to discussion about grapheme_levenshtein function.
Feel free
On 14/10/2024 01:02, Valentin Udaltsov wrote:
The problem is that in practice most of the PHP libraries consider
themselves to be compatible with newer PHP versions.
For instance, Symfony PropertyInfo uses `"php": ">=8.2"` constraint in
its `composer.json`.
That seems like a problem they have
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 01:28, Jordan LeDoux :
> Backwards compatible has never, in any work I've done through my entire
> career, meant something like "if you take old code and then update it to the
> new version incorrectly, it doesn't work"... that seems... obvious?
>
> What exactly is the clai
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 3:34 AM Rob Landers wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, at 12:20, Jonathan Vollebregt wrote:
>
> > A "proper" implementation won't break, but there may be subtle ways that
> "improper" implementations will break and thus it should be considered a BC
> break.
>
> This thread is
