Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Policy on 3rd party code

2024-10-08 Thread Mike Schinkel
> On Oct 7, 2024, at 7:31 PM, Jim Winstead wrote: > > What is currently blocking content that at least one unpaid volunteer* wants > to contribute in a way that leverages the existing technical infrastructure > is that there is vague, unwritten policy that we don't mention third-party > tools

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Policy on 3rd party code

2024-10-08 Thread Jim Winstead
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, at 11:36 AM, Larry Garfield wrote: > Since Jim's RFC proposal was criticized for being too vague, I hereby > offer a somewhat more prescriptive policy proposal on using 3rd party > code. (With JIm's blessing.) It's still more heuristics than rules, > but I think that's the

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Policy on 3rd party code

2024-10-08 Thread Rob Landers
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, at 01:31, Jim Winstead wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2024, at 12:33 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote: > > Or, imagine a store where PHP could sell T-Shirts, plushies and more, > > all to fund more core development? > > I have a hard time imagining that this would ever be more than a roundin

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Policy on 3rd party code

2024-10-08 Thread Jakub Zelenka
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:20 AM Jim Winstead wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, at 2:54 AM, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 7:38 PM Larry Garfield > wrote: > > Since Jim's RFC proposal was criticized for being too vague, I hereby > offer a somewhat more prescriptive policy pro