On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:17 PM Bilge wrote:
>
> Hi Internals,
>
> I just ran into a case where I needed the array key in an array_reduce()
> callback, but I can't access it :(
>
> So I wrote a PR to fix it: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/14986
>
> What do you think? Does this need an RFC?
>
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024, 01:29 mickmackusa, wrote:
> It is untrue that you "can't access it"; you just need to use an array of
> keys as the input array.
>
>> It is absolutely true and your workaround is just that; a workaround that
doesn't work at all when you also need the value.
Cheers,
Bilge
This is not the first time that a developer needs access to the input
array's keys within the callback of array_reduce().
It is untrue that you "can't access it"; you just need to use an array of
keys as the input array.
Some frameworks already have the feature of key access built into their
metho
Hi Internals,
I just ran into a case where I needed the array key in an array_reduce()
callback, but I can't access it :(
So I wrote a PR to fix it: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/14986
What do you think? Does this need an RFC?
Cheers,
Bilge
Hello Internals again:
I created this pull request:
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/14672
To have better error messages when decoding a JSON in php using the
json_last_error_msg() function.
With this change I pretend to have a message like:
"Syntax error, at character 0 near content: blah"
Hi there,
Le mar. 16 juil. 2024 à 10:13, Nicolas Grekas
a écrit :
>
>
> Le lun. 15 juil. 2024 à 21:42, Tim Düsterhus a écrit :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 7/15/24 09:25, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
>> > Testing is actually a good domain where resetting lazy objects might
>> open
>> > interesting use cases.
>> >
Hi Tim!
On 15.07.2024 at 23:50, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> That doesn't mean that I'm against the uniqid() deprecation, especially
>> if the deprecation message is clear on what to use instead.
>
> I will make sure to write useful migration docs, helping users making an
> educated choice for an alte
Le lun. 15 juil. 2024 à 21:42, Tim Düsterhus a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On 7/15/24 09:25, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
> > Testing is actually a good domain where resetting lazy objects might open
> > interesting use cases.
> > This reminded me about zenstruck/foundry, which leverages the
> > LazyProxyTrait to
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024, at 01:08, Rob Landers wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024, at 23:29, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 7/15/24 16:12, Rob Landers wrote:
>> > This always gets me. "safer" doesn't have a consistent meaning. For
>>
>> Yes it does. SHA-256 is safer than MD5. And on modern C
