On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 8:02 PM Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 17:38, Claude Pache wrote:
>
>
> Le 22 mars 2024 à 16:18, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] a écrit
> :
>
> $optionalExpiryDateTime = $expiry as ?DateTimeInterface else
> some_other_function($expiry);
> assert($optiona
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 5:51 PM Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 12:58, Robert Landers wrote:
> >
> >> $optionalExpiryDateTime = $expiry as ?DateTimeInterface else new
> >> DateTimeImmutable($expiry);
> > I'm not sure I can grok what this does...
> >
> > $optionalExpiryDat
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 17:38, Claude Pache wrote:
>
>> Le 22 mars 2024 à 16:18, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] a
>> écrit :
>>
>> $optionalExpiryDateTime = $expiry as ?DateTimeInterface else
>> some_other_function($expiry);
>> assert($optionalExpiryDateTime is ?DateTimeInterface); // cannot fail,
>>
> Le 22 mars 2024 à 16:18, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] a écrit
> :
>
> $optionalExpiryDateTime = $expiry as ?DateTimeInterface else
> some_other_function($expiry);
> assert($optionalExpiryDateTime is ?DateTimeInterface); // cannot fail,
> already asserted by the "as"
I think that the `is` operator
Hi Bob, and sorry for the late reply ...
On 19.03.24 01:05, Bob Weinand wrote:
Hey Marc,
On 18.3.2024 08:53:01, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 17.03.24 14:59, Bob Weinand wrote:
On 17.3.2024 13:23:04, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
Hello internals,
I have opened the vote for the "Rounding Integer
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 12:58, Robert Landers wrote:
>
>> $optionalExpiryDateTime = $expiry as ?DateTimeInterface else new
>> DateTimeImmutable($expiry);
> I'm not sure I can grok what this does...
>
> $optionalExpiryDateTime = ($expiry === null || $expiry instanceof
> DateTimeInterface) ? $expir
On 2024-03-22 10:46, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 08:17, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
We perhaps could make sure that as does not throw if used with `??`,
or that `??` catches the type error and returns the right-hand
expression instead:
So to do a nullable typecast you would
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:01 PM Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 08:17, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
>
> We perhaps could make sure that as does not throw if used with `??`, or that
> `??` catches the type error and returns the right-hand expression instead:
>
> So to do a nulla
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 10:05, Robert Landers wrote:
> After asking an AI for some examples and usages, the most compatible
> one would be C#'s. In actuality, I think it could be hugely simplified
> if we simply return null instead of throwing. There'd be no special
> case for |null, and it would m
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:31 AM Jordi Boggiano wrote:
>
> On 2024-03-21 16:02, Robert Landers wrote:
>
> $a as int|float
>
> would be an int, float, or thrown exception.
>
> $a as int|float|null
>
> would be an int, float, or null.
>
> Just a suggestion here which might be more palatable to Rowan
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, at 08:17, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
> We perhaps could make sure that as does not throw if used with `??`, or that
> `??` catches the type error and returns the right-hand expression instead:
> So to do a nullable typecast you would do:
>
> $a as int|float ?? null
>
While t
On 2024-03-21 16:02, Robert Landers wrote:
$a as int|float
would be an int, float, or thrown exception.
$a as int|float|null
would be an int, float, or null.
Just a suggestion here which might be more palatable to Rowan's wish for
consistency (which I can totally relate to):
We perhaps co
On 22 March 2024 00:04:27 GMT, Robert Landers wrote:
>I think that is where we are getting confused: `null` is a value (or
>at least, the absence of a value). The fact that the type system
>allows it to be used as though its a type (along with true and false)
>is interesting, but I think it is
13 matches
Mail list logo