Having looked into it, it seems difficult after all,
I would want a new $options argument for hash_final(), and some
internal changes to struct php_hash_blake3_ops,
and that internal change would have to be updated for all other hashes
PHP support..
I'm not up for doing that now.
And I think it sh
>BLAKE3 has 2 default sizes
Nope, only 1 canonical size, 256 bits.
*BUT* BLAKE3 is XOF, it can be exactly as long as you want it to be:
$ echo test | b3sum --length 5
dea2b412aa -
$ echo test | b3sum --length 10
dea2b412aa90f1b43a06 -
$ echo test | b3sum --length 32
dea2b412aa90f1b43a06ca5e8b8f
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 18:43, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> Can we add the BLAKE3 hash?
>
> Created a PR here: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/13194
>
> BLAKE3 is a very fast ("blazing fast") cryptographically secure hash. It is
> the latest iteration of the BLAKE hash, which was a SHA3 finali
Can we add the BLAKE3 hash?
Created a PR here: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/13194
BLAKE3 is a very fast ("blazing fast") cryptographically secure hash. It is
the latest iteration of the BLAKE hash, which was a SHA3 finalist~ see
https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3 for more info on BLAKE
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, at 9:47 AM, Lynn wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:51 AM Alexander Pravdin
> wrote:
>
>> I would also suggest supporting readonly classes and creating special
>> attributes to help map data fields to constructor arguments. Something like
>> this:
>>
>> readonly class User {
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 16:04, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> No disrespect to all the folks (including myself) who had a part in file
> I/O as it exists today, but it *IS* a hot mess. I've sketched out
> redesigns with folks over the years, but I have to be honest that I don't
> have the spoons to inve
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 1:29 AM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> Recently, I realized that the stream_bucket_new() and
> stream_bucket_make_writeable() functions
> create stdClass instances by dynamically adding a "bucket", a "data" and a
> "datalen" property to it.
>
I don't want to stand in the way of you
Hi
My name is Carlos Granados and I have been a PHP developer for a long time,
more than 15 years and I am quite interested in the PHP internals and
trying to learn as much as I can about them
This page in the Wiki https://wiki.php.net/internals/references has a lot
of links which are outdated an
Hi Alexander,
I would also suggest supporting readonly classes and creating special
attributes to help map data fields to constructor arguments. Something
like
this:
readonly class User {
public function __construct(
#[PDOField('user_id')]
public string $userId,
#
Hi Saki,
Welcome to the internal mailing list! I had looked the pull request,
and I'm pleased to have received your email promptly.
Thank you!
Now, I agree that it is often not possible to use `PDO::FETCH_CLASS`
because DB column names are typically snake case and variables and
properties ar
What should users replace $bucket property with in PHP 8.4? Is there
an alternative or is this a deprecation without a way to solve it? If
there is currently no alternative I would not deprecate it. Just
remove it once it becomes useless.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Hi Internals,
As I have already shared my intentions in
https://externals.io/message/122149, I'd like to add a dedicated object for
stream buckets as opposed to the stdClass instances which are used nowadays.
Please read https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dedicated_stream_bucket
Regards,
Máté
Hi Jakub,
> The only issue that I see that if you migrate the resource to object you
> effectively drop that property which might be a BC break but based on the
> recent RFC results it will happen in PHP 9.0 so it's not such a big issue.
> I think this might be actually an opportunity to deprecat
On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 20:08, Niels Dossche
wrote:
> Hi Gina
>
> On 18/01/2024 14:05, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
>
> > Hello Niels,
> >
> > Thank you for the RFC and the thorough overview of the current state.
> >
> > I think converting the new aliases to proper classes which have the co
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:14 PM Máté Kocsis wrote:
> I just submitted feedback to the PR but will also mention it here as it's
>> probably more an API thing. The problem that I see is that it combines two
>> distinct things and create quite ugly self reference inside the proposed
>> StreamBu
Hi Everyone,
I've just closed the votes with the following outcomes:
- The primary vote for the described approach for converting resources to
objects was accepted unanimously (30 yes, 0 no)
- Primary stream resources are going to be migrated in a major version,
rather in any minor or major versio
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:51 AM Alexander Pravdin
wrote:
> I would also suggest supporting readonly classes and creating special
> attributes to help map data fields to constructor arguments. Something like
> this:
>
> readonly class User {
> public function __construct(
> #[PDOField
17 matches
Mail list logo
