On Sat, Dec 2, 2023, at 1:32 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> The only note of caution I would throw in is that the recent Technical
> Committee proposal [1] was soundly rejected, so any *organisational* changes
> are likely to be a lot more contentious. So care should be taken to separate
> those fro
Hi Eugene.
> 1. We have sent commit to the first database and it responded us with OK
> (comitted)
> 2. Next we send commit to the second database, and it may be the case that in
> that very moment we lose connection. Hence, if connection is lost before
> final commit request, second database w
Nicolas Grekas wrote:
>There's one important piece missing in your analysis:
>
>https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-terms-of-service#6-contributions-under-repository-license
Note the second paragraph there:
> Isn't this just how it works already? Yep. This is widely accep
