Hi Marc,
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 1:21 AM Marc Bennewitz wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On 13.10.23 13:25, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:39 AM Marc Bennewitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi internals
> >>
> >> I'd like to put a new RFC under discussion:
> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer-r
Dear Niels,
First of all, thanks for all your hard work already on the DOM and
SimpleXML extensions. I have been following your work in PHP-SRC, great!
I am the author of this XSL 2.0 Transpiler in PHP package
(https://github.com/genkgo/xsl). It is indeed possible to use
workarounds for closu
Hi
On 10/15/23 02:04, tag Knife wrote:
I think the major pet peeve i have is that the "Randomizer" class is
encapsulating all random functions.
I would like to see each randomizer have its own class, since they are
under the Random namespace
anyway, I believe they should be Random/StringRandomiz
Hi
On 10/14/23 19:47, David Grudl wrote:
random number in the interval 0...1, so it does the same thing as
getFloat(0, 1). See
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/randomizer_additions#nextfloat
For the record: That is correct.
B) When trying to think of a more appropriate name (e.g.
`getFloat01()` ?),
Hi Pierre
> The first two probably only make sense for a numerically indexed array
I do not think so. If these are something like "reset/end without side
effects", then they should work fine even not numeric indexed array.
Regards.
Saki
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
T
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023, at 7:40 AM, Pierre wrote:
> The first two probably only make sense for a numerically indexed array,
> so I guess that array_is_list() (whatever the name is, I don't want to
> bikeshed about naming) would be a good addition as well, that, in my
> opinion, would be pertinen
Le 15/10/2023 à 01:11, Ben Ramsey a écrit :
On Oct 14, 2023, at 16:30, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023, at 20:00, David Grudl wrote:
PHP lacks two very basic functions for working with arrays:
- array_first() returning the first element of an array (or null)
- array_last() returning
Hi Marc
On 10/15/23 12:53, Marc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14.10.23 13:54, Niels Dossche wrote:
>> Hi Tim
>>
>> On 10/14/23 12:30, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 10/13/23 00:39, Niels Dossche wrote:
Please let me know your thoughts.
>>> What does calling ->registerPHPFunctions() do when it'
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, 04:49 Saki Takamachi, wrote:
> I came up with the idea of using a signature like array_filter(), and
> when a callback is passed, "return the first/last element that matches the
> condition" and "return null if there is no match."
>
> The downside to this idea is the loss o
Hi,
On 14.10.23 13:54, Niels Dossche wrote:
Hi Tim
On 10/14/23 12:30, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 10/13/23 00:39, Niels Dossche wrote:
Please let me know your thoughts.
What does calling ->registerPHPFunctions() do when it's called more than once?
Will the existing allow-list be overwritten
10 matches
Mail list logo
