On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09 AM G. P. B. wrote:
>
> Hello internals,
>
> I'm opening the vote for the
> Deprecate remains of string evaluated code assertions RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/assert-string-eval-cleanup
>
> It will last for two weeks and end on Wednesday the 12th of July
>
> Best re
Hi again,
On 22.05.23 13:55, Robert Landers wrote:
New function(s) on the other hand sounds like an ugly solution as well
only helping people explicitly searching for it after they got bitten at
least once.
What about deprecating round() in favor of round_float() and
round_int()? or something.
Hello internals,
I'm opening the vote for the
Deprecate remains of string evaluated code assertions RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/assert-string-eval-cleanup
It will last for two weeks and end on Wednesday the 12th of July
Best regards,
George P. Banyard
Hello internals,
I'm opening the vote for the Path to Saner Increment/Decrement operators
RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/saner-inc-dec-operators
It will last for two weeks and end on Wednesday the 12th of July
Best regards,
George P. Banyard
Hi Ben
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:54 PM Ben Ramsey wrote:
>
> > On Jun 27, 2023, at 04:01, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ben, Hi Rowan
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:55 PM Ben Ramsey wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jun 20, 2023, at 06:06, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 10:25,
Hi
On 6/14/23 10:09, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
I just opened the vote for the "Marking overridden methods
(#[\Override])" RFC. The RFC contains a single vote that requires a 2/3
majority to pass. Voting runs 2 weeks until 2023-06-28 08:30 UTC.
Please find the following resources for your references:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:11 AM Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> > Also, I'm wondering whether it's worth the complexity to add support for
> > another magic method,
> > or would we be fine without this feature and its benefits? To put it
> > another way: how much
> > complexity is it worth to fix the pro
> Instead of passing arguments to __clone(), I wondered about a new
>> __clone_with(array
>> $properties) that could be implemented next to __clone(), with the
>> following behavior:
>>
>>- if only __clone is implemented, same behavior as always
>>- if __clone_with is implemented, __clone i
