Am 10.03.2023 um 20:04 schrieb Eugene Sidelnyk :
> Another simplified example:
>
> ```
> // partial application
> foo(bar(1, ...));
While it is not as concise as your version I think the work-around with short
arrow functions works ok unless your code is full of partial applications:
foo
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, at 2:16 PM, Eugene Sidelnyk wrote:
> I glanced over this RFC and suggested syntax has question marks. Each one
> stands for a single parameter.
>
> Since there are named arguments already, it seems to be redundant. We'd
> rather pass couple of named arguments and place the ...
I glanced over this RFC and suggested syntax has question marks. Each one
stands for a single parameter.
Since there are named arguments already, it seems to be redundant. We'd
rather pass couple of named arguments and place the ... construction at the
ending than twirl around with question marks
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, at 1:04 PM, Eugene Sidelnyk wrote:
> Hello internals!
> I'm just wondering why First class callable syntax doesn't allow partial
> application?
> Recently I stumbled across following scenario where it could be really
> useful:
>
> ```
> public function __invoke(SendOtpComm
Seems Uncle Bob with his boy scout rule left the room...
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 2:19 PM Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2023/03/01 13:15, Max Kellermann wrote:
> > IMO this is a bug in the process, and I'm trying to fix it. It should
> > be allowed to merge small incremental improvements without a d
Hello internals!
I'm just wondering why First class callable syntax doesn't allow partial
application?
Recently I stumbled across following scenario where it could be really
useful:
```
public function __invoke(SendOtpCommand $command)
{
$this->cache->get($command->getPhone(), $thi
On 2023/03/01 13:15, Max Kellermann wrote:
> IMO this is a bug in the process, and I'm trying to fix it. It should
> be allowed to merge small incremental improvements without a dedicated
> RFC.
>
> This is the first draft of my RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/code_optimizations
My RFC draft i
