>
>
>> So it's mostly a syntactic sugar that allows defining an interface for
> the current class that is already implemented by the current class.
>
Yeah, while answering to you, I've actually came to the same conclusion.
>
> The interface name is the same as the class name and based on the con
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 7:53 AM someniatko wrote:
> We want to write some tests for the Service class, but we don't want
> to use a real SomeDependency instance
> during tests. A common approach is to either extract an interface
> (JUST to make it testable), or to drop the
> `final` keyword and a
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:30 PM someniatko wrote:
> > This sounds interesting but it breaks some expectations.
> >
> > Interesting because you can have any class act as an interface for other
> classes with the interface being built up of any public properties or
> method that exists on that clas
> This sounds interesting but it breaks some expectations.
>
> Interesting because you can have any class act as an interface for other
> classes with the interface being built up of any public properties or method
> that exists on that class.
In my original suggestion, it's not like any class,
> On 21 Feb 2023, at 18:52, someniatko wrote:
>
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a cl
Hi Someniatko,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:52 PM someniatko wrote:
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this
> time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constru
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:52 PM someniatko wrote:
>
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a class
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023, 8:52 AM someniatko wrote:
> Hi again, internals
>
> My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this
> time.
>
>
> ## Idea
>
> Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
> properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a class b
Hi again, internals
My marathon of some crazy ideas continues :D, with less crazy one this time.
## Idea
Allow "reimplementing" the non-static public API (that is public
properties and methods, excluding constructor) of a class by other
classes like this:
```php
final class interface A {
p
Hi Claude,
No, I didn't misunderstand you, I just didn't specify my answer enough:
Enums can be assigned to their own class constants because of their special
behavior, namely that enum cases are evaluated and then instantiated right
away,
during the compilation of the enum case. This is easily p
10 matches
Mail list logo
