Hi
On 10/30/22 17:22, Larry Garfield wrote:
2. There are ample use cases for most operations to return an array or a lazy
iterable. Both totally exist. I solved that by also having a separate version
of each function, eg, amap() vs itmap(). The former returned an array, the
latter returned
On 30/10/2022 11:38, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
I think the consensus is more that it needs to be configurable and I'm
in favour of configurable option as well as we should not break the
current format.
In case of any confusion, I think this should be configurable as
"include microseconds: on /
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022, at 8:45 AM, tyson andre wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/iterator_xyz_accept_array recently passed in
> php 8.2,
> fixing a common inconvenience of those functions throwing a TypeError
> for arrays.
>
> However, from the `iterator_` name
> (https://www.ph
2022年10月14日(金) 13:33 Alexandru Pătrănescu :
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 22:37 Joshua Rüsweg via internals <
> internals@lists.php.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Tim Düsterhus and I have created an RFC to add new methods that solve
> > commonly encountered use cases to \Random\Randomizer. Specifically
>
2022年10月6日(木) 6:44 Joshua Rüsweg via internals :
> Hi
>
> I would like to introduce a new method for the new Randomizer class [1].
> I would like to have a function that generates a random string for me
> based on a given alphabet. This function is useful as a building block,
> as many use cases r
Hi,
Please try to not top post.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:29 AM Mikhail Galanin via internals <
internals@lists.php.net> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I tried following Derrek's approach (to introduce a new function).
>
> A couple of considerations:
>
> We used to have some pain when this format
