On 05.07.2022 01:34, Pierrick Charron wrote:
Hi internals,
I opened voting for the new Curl URL API as part of PHP8.2.
I found some not clear fragments in the RFC.
const CURLUPART_USER = UNKNOWN; // what UNKNOWN?
"All errors of libcurl will become CurlUrlException."
"Setting a part to a nul
On 05/07/2022 00:34, Pierrick Charron wrote:
All recent discussions show that we are not even close to getting a
consensus on how the new CurlUrl OO API should be done. After changing my
mind 300 times in the last day, I decided to only propose the procedural
implementation that stays consistent
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:11, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot
> wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
> > coming week.
> > As this is my first RFC, I'm not so sure how this typically gets ki
Sorry, I forgot to include the RFC Url :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/curl-url-api
Le lun. 4 juill. 2022, à 19 h 34, Pierrick Charron a
écrit :
> Hi internals,
>
> I opened voting for the new Curl URL API as part of PHP8.2.
>
> All recent discussions show that we are not even close to getting a
> co
Hi internals,
I opened voting for the new Curl URL API as part of PHP8.2.
All recent discussions show that we are not even close to getting a
consensus on how the new CurlUrl OO API should be done. After changing my
mind 300 times in the last day, I decided to only propose the procedural
implemen
Hello!
I have updated the RFC for constants in traits to clearly state
that Enumerations can use traits having constants.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constants_in_traits
As I said before, if there is no further discussion, I will open
the voting tomorrow.
Thanks!
--
Shinji Igarashi
2022年7月2日(土) 1
Hi
On 7/4/22 20:23, Timon de Groot wrote:
I went with Jakub's advice and opened the vote, not getting into any
other adjustments to the RFC prior to opening it for vote.
The vote for the json_encode 'indent' parameter is now open. It will run
until 15 July.
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_e
Hi internals,
I went with Jakub's advice and opened the vote, not getting into any
other adjustments to the RFC prior to opening it for vote.
The vote for the json_encode 'indent' parameter is now open. It will run
until 15 July.
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/json_encode_indentation.
Kind
Hi,
On lundi 4 juillet 2022 11:47:03 CEST Nicolas Grekas wrote:
> I'm just wondering if there could be a way to enable the auto-capture
> optimization for arrow functions. Having three kinds of rules for capturing
> feels too much, especially when there are that subtles for short closures.
> Maybe
Hi,
On lundi 4 juillet 2022 12:04:59 CEST Marco Pivetta wrote:
> I ended up voting NO due to the fact that there is no mention of `$this`
> behavior changes ( https://externals.io/message/117888#117889 ) : I also
> disagree with NikiC's stance on this being the same construct as before (
> https:/
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
> coming week.
> As this is my first RFC, I'm not so sure how this typically gets kicked
> off, so I'd like to know what I need to do!
>
You just need
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 04.07.2022 at 10:16, Remi Collet wrote:
>
> > In PHP 8.1:
> >
> > This branch is 1 commit ahead, 7 commits behind master.
> >
> >
> > This seems terribly wrong, looks like was merged from master
> > (NEWS file have 8.2 entries)
> >
> >
> > Can s
I ended up voting NO due to the fact that there is no mention of `$this`
behavior changes ( https://externals.io/message/117888#117889 ) : I also
disagree with NikiC's stance on this being the same construct as before (
https://externals.io/message/117888#117897 ), so I really wanted to get rid
of
Hi there,
Greetings, Internalians.
>
> The vote for auto-capture closures is now open. It will run until 15 July.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/auto-capture-closure
>
Thanks for the RFC, I voted yes as I think the optimized auto-capturing
logic is sound.
Having "function()" still be a first-cla
On 04.07.2022 at 10:16, Remi Collet wrote:
> In PHP 8.1:
>
> This branch is 1 commit ahead, 7 commits behind master.
>
>
> This seems terribly wrong, looks like was merged from master
> (NEWS file have 8.2 entries)
>
>
> Can some GIT expert check and fix that ?
Derick is working on fixing the iss
> > In PHP 8.1:
> >
> > This branch is 1 commit ahead, 7 commits behind master.
> >
> >
> > This seems terribly wrong, looks like was merged from master
> > (NEWS file have 8.2 entries)
> >
> >
> > Can some GIT expert check and fix that ?
>
> I guess that the "1 commit ahead" is just that your loca
Am 04.07.2022 um 11:04 schrieb Patrick ALLAERT:
I guess that the "1 commit ahead" is just that your local branch is a merge
with master.
No. If you look at https://github.com/php/php-src/tree/PHP-8.1 right now
then you will see "This branch is 1 commit ahead, 7 commits behind master."
--
PHP
Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 10:16, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In PHP 8.1:
>
> This branch is 1 commit ahead, 7 commits behind master.
>
>
> This seems terribly wrong, looks like was merged from master
> (NEWS file have 8.2 entries)
>
>
> Can some GIT expert check and fix that ?
>
>
> Regards,
> R
Hi,
In PHP 8.1:
This branch is 1 commit ahead, 7 commits behind master.
This seems terribly wrong, looks like was merged from master
(NEWS file have 8.2 entries)
Can some GIT expert check and fix that ?
Regards,
Remi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Hi
On 7/4/22 09:38, Timon de Groot wrote:
If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
coming week.
With the minimum voting period being 14 days as per
https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting and the feature freeze for PHP
8.2 being 2022-07-19 23:59:59 UTC as per
As a flag can't really hurt, I'm thinking of going with option B before
starting the vote.
Also agree with ignoring the indent parameter, as a tab character is
less dependent on how much it is repeated.
Kind regards,
Timon
On 04-07-2022 03:22, Kevin Israel wrote:
On 7/3/22 18:01, Jakub Zelen
Hi internals,
If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
coming week.
As this is my first RFC, I'm not so sure how this typically gets kicked
off, so I'd like to know what I need to do!
Kind regards,
Timon
On 04-07-2022 00:01, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
Hi,
On Fri,
Hi
On 6/21/22 16:27, Tim Düsterhus, WoltLab GmbH wrote:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/iterator_xyz_accept_array
which I am officially opening up for discussion, just in time for PHP 8.2.
Voting will start in 2 weeks on 2022-07-05. Voting will end in 4 weeks
on 2022-07-19.
Tomorrow is the 5th, her
23 matches
Mail list logo
