On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 at 06:20, Michael Morris wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 10:47 PM Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
>
> >
> > >Суббота, 1 января 2022, 17:41 +03:00 от Rowan Tommins <
> > rowan.coll...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >On 31/12/2021 00:21, Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
> > >> I support this behavior
>Воскресенье, 2 января 2022, 8:20 +03:00 от Michael Morris :
>
>On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 10:47 PM Kirill Nesmeyanov < n...@xakep.ru > wrote:
>
>>
>> >Суббота, 1 января 2022, 17:41 +03:00 от Rowan Tommins <
>> rowan.coll...@gmail.com >:
>> >
>> >On 31/12/2021 00:21, Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
>> >
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 9:20 PM Michael Morris wrote:
> I leave the decision making to the maintainers and contribs who do the
> actual work. Hell, I personally don't even use PHP that much these days
> having gotten a job where I focus on writing Cucumber tests in JavaScript
> that run on node.js
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 10:47 PM Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
>
> >Суббота, 1 января 2022, 17:41 +03:00 от Rowan Tommins <
> rowan.coll...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >On 31/12/2021 00:21, Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
> >> I support this behavior fix because in its current form, due to a
> similar problem (almost?)
>Суббота, 1 января 2022, 17:41 +03:00 от Rowan Tommins
>:
>
>On 31/12/2021 00:21, Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
>> I support this behavior fix because in its current form, due to a similar
>> problem (almost?), all PSR-7 implementations contain bugs that violate
>> RFC7230 (section 3.2:
>> https:/
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 15:19, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 8:48 AM Craig Francis
> wrote:
>
>> Is there any value in me proposing an RFC to update *some* internal
>> functions so they can accept NULL?
>>
>
> I'm not hard against this idea. The interpretation of null in these
> co
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:11 PM Jordan LeDoux
wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I last brought this RFC up for discussion in August, and there was
> certainly interesting discussion. Since then there have been many
> improvements, and I'd like to re-open discussion on this RFC. I mentioned
> in the f
On 31/12/2021 00:21, Kirill Nesmeyanov wrote:
I support this behavior fix because in its current form, due to a similar problem (almost?), all PSR-7
implementations contain bugs that violate RFC7230 (section
3.2:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.2 ). Thus, physically, by
