[PHP-DEV] PHP 8.0.11RC1 Available for testing

2021-09-09 Thread Sara Golemon
PHP 8.0.11RC1 has just been released and can be downloaded from: https://downloads.php.net/~pollita/ Or use the git tag: php-8.0.11RC1 Windows binaries are available at https://windows.php.net/qa#php-8.0 Please test it carefully, and report any bugs in the bug system: https://bugs.php.net. Has

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.4.24RC1 is available for testing

2021-09-09 Thread Derick Rethans
Hi, I sent this with the old (and wrong manifest), the real signature is correct online, and attached again too: php-7.4.24RC1.tar.gz SHA256 hash: 9c17c2f1972a3daef29979a7cd93f6562df6d1a62dab9a09b733abf53441bac3 PGP signature: -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEWlKIB4H3VWCL+BX8kQ3rRv

[PHP-DEV] PHP 7.4.24RC1 is available for testing

2021-09-09 Thread Derick Rethans
PHP 7.4.24RC1 has just been released and can be downloaded from: Or use the git tag: php-7.4.24RC1 Windows binaries are available at: Please test it carefully, and report any bugs in the bug system at .

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] $this return type

2021-09-09 Thread Ben Ramsey
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 09:47, Mike Schinkel wrote: > >> On Sep 9, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Flávio Heleno wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:27 AM Sebastian Bergmann >> wrote: >> >>> Am 07.09.2021 um 12:28 schrieb Nikita Popov: I have some reservations about this (which basically come down to

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] $this return type

2021-09-09 Thread Mike Schinkel
> On Sep 9, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Flávio Heleno wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:27 AM Sebastian Bergmann > wrote: > >> Am 07.09.2021 um 12:28 schrieb Nikita Popov: >>> I have some reservations about this (which basically come down to $this >> not >>> being a proper "type", so should it be in

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] $this return type

2021-09-09 Thread Flávio Heleno
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:27 AM Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Am 07.09.2021 um 12:28 schrieb Nikita Popov: > > I have some reservations about this (which basically come down to $this > not > > being a proper "type", so should it be in the type system?) but I can see > > the practical usefulness, so