Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 8:54 PM Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Please, let me know you decision according
> https://github.com/derickr/timelib/pull/99
>
> This workaround fix makes ~170 times improvement on "new DateTimeZone()"
> and as result visible improvement on some real-life apps (e.g
Hey Dan.
I do appriciate to hear your point of view. This thread is now very off-topic.
With respect to Marco and other people that wants to discuss guidelines for the
RFCs and the role of RMs, I will not answer you anymore.
Feel free to reach out to me privately or in a new thread.
// Tobia
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 19:11, Tobias Nyholm wrote:
> Hey Dan.
>
> I see that you read what I wrote and intrepid it in the worst possible way.
This is also passive aggressive phrasing. You're trying to make me
feel bad for pointing out how your phrasing is not conducive to a
pleasant productive co
Hi Derick,
Please, let me know you decision according
https://github.com/derickr/timelib/pull/99
This workaround fix makes ~170 times improvement on "new DateTimeZone()"
and as result visible improvement on some real-life apps (e.g Symfony demo
gets ~7% according to callgrind).
This is a huge dif
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:14 PM Côme Chilliet <
come.chill...@fusiondirectory.org> wrote:
> Le Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:02:49 +0200,
> Nikita Popov a écrit :
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I'd like to propose the deprecation of "dynamic properties", that is
> > properties that have not been declared in the
Le Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:02:49 +0200,
Nikita Popov a écrit :
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to propose the deprecation of "dynamic properties", that is
> properties that have not been declared in the class (stdClass and
> __get/__set excluded, of course):
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_dynam
