On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:51 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> We have a better way to specify markers for the engine: Magic methods. I
> think some people have a mistaken notion that engine-integrated interfaces
> are always better than magic methods. This is only the case if such
> interfaces are actua
>
> This seems like a good opportunity to go one step further and have loops
> create a new scope, which would automagically handle the unwrapping with out
> worrying about the edge cases. Obviously, this would be a bigger BC break,
> but one worth considering.
>
Sounds reasonable, but this i
PHP 8.0.10RC1 has just been released and can be downloaded from:
https://downloads.php.net/~carusogabriel/ (thanks Derick for uploading
everything)
Or use the git tag: php-8.0.10RC1
Windows binaries are available at https://windows.php.net/qa#php-8.0
Please test it carefully, and report any bug
Morning Nikita, all,
The exception was granted to ratify consensus that I thought we had - and
that one of the two primary votes on the current RFC seems to support.
However, the RFC we got was something that contained multiple primary votes
- we must consider the first two votes primary, we don'
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:14 PM Rowan Tommins
wrote:
> On 07/08/2021 18:57, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> > can someone shed some light on this? why does mb_check_encoding seem to
> be
> > so much slower than the alternatives?
> > benchmark code+results is here
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/6869075
On Aug 16 2021, at 1:21 pm, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Jordan LeDoux
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:25 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> function addMultiple(CollectionInterface $collection, mixed ...$inputs):
> >> void {
> >> foreach ($inputs as $
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 9:45 AM Joe Watkins wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> The initial RFC was clear that nullability was not supported, however that
> doesn't seem to be have widely understood.
>
> When I said we should move forward I did imagine that there was some
> consensus about the syntax we sh
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Jordan LeDoux
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:25 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>>
>> function addMultiple(CollectionInterface $collection, mixed ...$inputs):
>> void {
>> foreach ($inputs as $input) $collection->add($input);
>> }
>>
>> A static analyzer shou
Please rearrange and add words as necessary, so that they makes sense :)
"... however that doesn't seem to have been widely understood".
Cheers
Joe
On Monday, 16 August 2021, Joe Watkins wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> The initial RFC was clear that nullability was not supported, however that
> does
Morning all,
The initial RFC was clear that nullability was not supported, however that
doesn't seem to be have widely understood.
When I said we should move forward I did imagine that there was some
consensus about the syntax we should use if we were to support nullability.
As this conversation
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:22 AM Tobias Nyholm
wrote:
> Hey.
>
> > No mistake: the "pure intersection types" RFC was explicitly designed to
> avoid scope creep (this RFC).
>
>
> Just because it was intentional, does not make it less of a mistake.
> I see that we have different views of this. And I
11 matches
Mail list logo
