On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 20:15, Craig Francis wrote:
> Hi Internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal for the
> is-literal function.
>
> The vote closes 2021-07-19
>
> The proposal is to add the function is_literal(), a simple way to identify
> if a string was written
Replying in one long email to all three who replied to me:
> On Jul 5, 2021, at 8:03 AM, Guilliam Xavier wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Your links speak *in general*. However this is *specifically for PHP*:
> https://www.php.net/manual/en/errorfunc.constants.php#errorfunc.constants.errorlevels.e-deprec
Hi Internals,
I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal for the
is-literal function.
The vote closes 2021-07-19
The proposal is to add the function is_literal(), a simple way to identify
if a string was written by a developer, removing the risk of a variable
containing an Injec
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021, at 9:12 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, at 2:00 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > Hi folks. Me again.
> >
> > A year ago, I posted an RFC for a pipe operator, |>, aka function
> > concatenation. At the time, the main thrust of the feedback was "cool,
> > like,
On 05/07/2021 15:35, Nikita Popov wrote:
The actual echo syntax is echo "Foo". PHP allows you to write echo("Foo")
in the same way it allows you to write echo("Foo"). Don't do it :)
Indeed. Note that this is valid:
echo "hello", " ", "world";
But this is not:
echo("hello", " ", "wor
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:14 PM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:51 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> As the partial function application RFC has not been accepted, I have
>> opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/first_class_callable_syntax.
>> The
>> vote closes on 2021-07-16.
>>
>>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 5:51 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> As the partial function application RFC has not been accepted, I have
> opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/first_class_callable_syntax. The
> vote closes on 2021-07-16.
>
> This RFC uses a syntax that is forward-compatible with partial f
Le lun. 5 juil. 2021 à 13:39, Mike Schinkel a écrit :
> > On Jul 5, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Rowan Tommins
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/07/2021 11:46, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> >> Did we ever deprecated something without the immediate intention of
> >> removing it?
> >
> >
> > What would that even mean?
>
> I
On 05/07/2021 12:39, Mike Schinkel wrote:
know that you, and others on this list, have chosen to define deprecation as
including removal, but that is actually not the accepted definition on the web,
nor is it in any way a requirement, it is just your preference.
I stand corrected, I had no
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 1:56 PM Patrick ALLAERT
wrote:
> Le jeu. 1 juil. 2021 à 12:23, Nikita Popov a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2.
>> The vote closes 2021-07-15.
>>
>> See https://externals.io/message/114729 for the di
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 13:39, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Rowan Tommins
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/07/2021 11:46, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> >> Did we ever deprecated something without the immediate intention of
> >> removing it?
> >
> >
> > What would that even mean?
>
> It wo
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 1:39 PM Mike Schinkel wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Rowan Tommins
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/07/2021 11:46, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> >> Did we ever deprecated something without the immediate intention of
> >> removing it?
> >
> >
> > What would that even mean?
>
> It
Le jeu. 1 juil. 2021 à 12:23, Nikita Popov a écrit :
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2.
> The vote closes 2021-07-15.
>
> See https://externals.io/message/114729 for the discussion thread on this
> proposal. I think a decent tl;dr is that
> On Jul 5, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> On 05/07/2021 11:46, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
>> Did we ever deprecated something without the immediate intention of
>> removing it?
>
>
> What would that even mean?
It would mean that although the functions are available and allowed, they a
On 05/07/2021 11:46, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
Did we ever deprecated something without the immediate intention of
removing it?
What would that even mean? Surely a deprecation, by definition, is a
notice that something is going to be removed.
There used to be an E_STRICT category, which expres
Le lun. 5 juil. 2021 à 11:43, Dmitry Stogov a
écrit :
> Return void by reference should be disabled (not deprecated)
>
I second that.
Le mer. 30 juin 2021 à 11:32, Nikita Popov a écrit :
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_1. The
> vote closes on 2021-07-14.
>
> This RFC is a collection of various deprecation suggestions from different
> people. Each deprecation is voted separ
Hey Nikita,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:32 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_1. The
> vote closes on 2021-07-14.
>
> This RFC is a collection of various deprecation suggestions from different
> people. Each deprecation i
Le jeu. 1 juil. 2021 à 12:23, Nikita Popov a écrit :
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2.
> The vote closes 2021-07-15.
>
> See https://externals.io/message/114729 for the discussion thread on this
> proposal. I think a decent tl;dr is that
Return void by reference should be disabled (not deprecated)
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:32 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_1. The
> vote closes on 2021-07-14.
>
> This RFC is a collection of various deprecation sugges
20 matches
Mail list logo
