> On Jun 16, 2021, at 7:47 AM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 3:16 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Given that constructors that have side effects are arguably broken to begin
> with (modulo debugging), I'd be comfortable with explicitly saying that the
> evaluation order is und
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 10:19 pm, Bruce Weirdan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:01 AM Craig Francis
> wrote:
> > is_literal can be used for strings because we can flag what’s
> > user and what’s developer defined, and with Matthew’s request, it could
> do
> > integers (because an integer valu
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:01 AM Craig Francis wrote:
> is_literal can be used for strings because we can flag what’s
> user and what’s developer defined, and with Matthew’s request, it could do
> integers (because an integer value alone is not inherently risky, and it’s
> already used a lot).
To
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 9:13 pm, Dik Takken wrote:
> On 16-06-2021 19:24, Craig Francis wrote:
> > Matthew Brown wants to support integer values, simply because so much
> code
> > already includes them, and I cannot find a single way that integers alone
> > can cause issues from an Injection Vulne
On 16-06-2021 19:24, Craig Francis wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 18:00, Craig Francis
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to start the discussion on the is_literal() RFC:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal
>>
>
>
>
> Hi Internals,
>
> Following up on the is_literal() RFC, thanks for the feedback. It
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 18:00, Craig Francis
wrote:
> I'd like to start the discussion on the is_literal() RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal
>
Hi Internals,
Following up on the is_literal() RFC, thanks for the feedback. It looks
like there are only 2 minor open issues - updating the i
> Over half of the objections are to functionality, over half to unspecified
> reasons,
I support people choosing not to directly respond with their
unspecified reasons, but if anyone is open to sharing I would
appreciate them doing so. I agree with Nikita that the concept is
useful, and with som
Hi folks. The vote for the Partial Function Application RFC is now open, and
will run until 30 June.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/partial_function_application
Of particular note, a few people had asked about using ...? instead of ... for
the variadic placeholder. In the end we decided not to expl
Hi Nikita,
> I like the concept here. I think the naming choice is unfortunate, and
> causing confusion for people.
>
> What you're really proposing here is a data structure: A sequence of
> key-value-pairs. That generally seems like a sensible thing to have, in that
> we can implement it sign
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 3:16 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > Arguments and attributes are enough to justify this RFC on its own, but is
> > there a way we can resolve the static property question? Right now the RFC
> > says "these initializers are evaluated lazily the first time a class is
> > used
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 10:59 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 2021, at 6:53 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > As we're moving closer to feature freeze, I'd like to close down this RFC
> > to further additions, and move towards voting.
> >
> > Feedback on the proposed deprecations is appre
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:01 PM tyson andre
wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> Voting has started on the ImmutableIterable RFC
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/cachediterable
>
> Previous discussion can be found in https://externals.io/message/114834
>
> Recent changes:
> - The name was renamed to `ImmutableIt
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 6:31 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, at 10:06 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 5:02 PM Larry Garfield
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, at 9:03 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > > > Hi internals,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to propos
13 matches
Mail list logo
