Den søn. 6. jun. 2021 kl. 00.09 skrev Ayesh Karunaratne :
>
> Hi Ben,
> Thank you for opening this PR and the discussion. With the wide
> availability of AVIF/AV1 support in browsers, I think this will fit
> nicely.
>
> We have the Namespaces in Bundled Extensions RFC
> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/na
> On Jun 5, 2021, at 12:51 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, at 10:19 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>>
>> This proposal is similar to the
>> https://wik
Hi Kamil,
> I have reworked the RFC based on some feedback. The improved RFC now will
> hold 2 votes. One vote to decide whether the behaviour should be deprecated
> from false, and another from null.
>
> If there are no objections then I would like to start the votes in a couple
> of days.
>
>
Hi Ben,
Thank you for opening this PR and the discussion. With the wide
availability of AVIF/AV1 support in browsers, I think this will fit
nicely.
We have the Namespaces in Bundled Extensions RFC
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces_in_bundled_extensions) passed, so
perhaps, the new functions are
On 05/06/2021 20:50, Kamil Tekiela wrote:
However, I would still like to hear from you whether you
use autovivification from false and/or null in your projects. So far, I was
not able to identify when this would be useful in real-life scenarios.
As per the RFC:
"In PHP 8.1, appending to a vari
Hi Internals,
I have reworked the RFC based on some feedback. The improved RFC now will
hold 2 votes. One vote to decide whether the behaviour should be deprecated
from false, and another from null.
If there are no objections then I would like to start the votes in a couple
of days.
However, I w
Hi internals,
Voting has started on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/cachediterable_straw_poll and
ends in a week on June 12, 2021
(the voting period is shorter because this is a poll, not an RFC, and the
feature freeze is soon)
Previously, https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces_in_bundled_extensions pass
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, at 10:19 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>
> This proposal is similar to the
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/write_once_properties RFC that has been declined
> pre
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:20 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>>
>> This proposal is similar to the
>> https://wik
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:20 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>
> This proposal is similar to the
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/write_once_properties RFC that has been declined
> previo
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:20 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>
> This proposal is similar to the
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/write_once_properties RFC that has been declined
> previo
Le 05/06/2021 à 12:06, Nikita Popov a écrit :
Yes, this is supported. What matters is the scope from which the
initialization occurs. If you rebind a closure to the scope of the class,
then you can perform any operations that would be legal inside that class,
including access to private propertie
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 11:47 AM Pierre wrote:
> Le 04/06/2021 à 17:19, Nikita Popov a écrit :
>
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly
> properties:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>
> This proposal is similar to thehttps://wiki.php.net/rfc/write_once_prop
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021, 11:47 Pierre wrote:
> Le 04/06/2021 à 17:19, Nikita Popov a écrit :
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
> >
> > This proposal is similar to the
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/write
Le 04/06/2021 à 17:19, Nikita Popov a écrit :
Hi internals,
I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
This proposal is similar to the
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/write_once_properties RFC that has been declined
previously. One significa
Hi Nikita,
Le ven. 4 juin 2021 à 17:19, Nikita Popov a écrit :
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>
Thanks for the proposal, that's quite appealing!
I voted "no" on the previous proposal because it didn'
16 matches
Mail list logo
