> On May 16, 2021, at 10:43 PM, Hossein Baghayi
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 09:03, Hossein Baghayi
> wrote:
>
>> Providing ? as a means of placeholder for some arguments and ignoring the
>> rest could complicate the readability in my opinion.
>> Maybe we should move (?) out of the ar
On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 09:03, Hossein Baghayi
wrote:
> Providing ? as a means of placeholder for some arguments and ignoring the
> rest could complicate the readability in my opinion.
> Maybe we should move (?) out of the arguments list as a means of creating
> a partial.
>
> What I realized is t
Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to present an RFC for property accessors:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/property_accessors
Hi internals,
I am new here.
Thank you Nikita for this wonderful proposal.
A few days ago, I sent an identical message to this thread but I am not
sure it was sent properly. So
As I've fully finished the implementation, I intend to bring this to a vote
on Wednesday if no new concerns come up (besides the usual question about
the usefulness of the feature).
Máté
> On May 15, 2021, at 4:20 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> On 15 May 2021 00:09:41 BST, Paul Crovella wrote:
>> I think this highlights where the misunderstanding of this feature is.
>
>
> I think the fact that there is so much confusion highlights why it is worth
> considering different desig
