Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

2019-10-06 Thread Lynn
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 08:22 Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > We seem to be experiencing something of a philosophical clash with regard > > to deprecation. Perhaps we should attempt to establish some general > > guidelines for deprecation as a group? > > I personally thought we had thom - no

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

2019-10-06 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! > We seem to be experiencing something of a philosophical clash with regard > to deprecation. Perhaps we should attempt to establish some general > guidelines for deprecation as a group? I personally thought we had thom - no removing things unless there's a very good reason to. And yet, we h

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

2019-10-06 Thread Kris Craig
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 12:36 PM Zeev Suraski wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 17:45 Mark Randall wrote: > > > Hi Internals, > > > > I put forward the following RFC "Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)" for > > discussion. > > > > > Mark, all, > > I’m not sure what planetary alignment or moon phase tr

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

2019-10-06 Thread Zeev Suraski
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 17:45 Mark Randall wrote: > Hi Internals, > > I put forward the following RFC "Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)" for > discussion. > Mark, all, I’m not sure what planetary alignment or moon phase triggered this recent compatibility-breaking onslaught, but it can’t go on l

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

2019-10-06 Thread Mark Randall
On 06/10/2019 14:18, Reinis Rozitis wrote: Since `` are used for literal strings (for poorly chosen reserved words as field, table names (which happens from time to time)) in MySQL (multiline) queries I doubt there is a simple way to distinguish and replace everything to exec(). Hi, As the

RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)

2019-10-06 Thread Reinis Rozitis
> -Original Message- > From: Olumide Samson [mailto:oludons...@gmail.com] > > it should be deprecated for exec usage since they both do same thing With that logic This isn't high cost breaking changes coz it has a verifiable, ready > alternative to upgrade to without huge Regex search