Hi David,
TCO modifies the call stack, which means features relying on it are not
reliable any more, e.g. debug_backtrace, stack trace of an exception, etc. As
a result, ES6 only ask to enable TCO in strict mode, which dropped support for
func.arguments and func.caller. PHP don't have similar
Am Mo., 29. Apr. 2019 um 09:03 Uhr schrieb Bob Weinand :
>
>
> Am 25.04.2019 um 11:52 schrieb Nikita Popov
> mailto:nikita@gmail.com>>:
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:33 PM Bob Weinand
> mailto:bobw...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I feel like concatenation having the same precedence than ad
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:37 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> > The idea is to merge in PHP-7.4, but if there's a consensus that this
>> > should go into PHP 8 only, so it is :)
>> >
>> > Technically a BC break, so 8.0 would be the preferred branch IMO.
>>
>
> As this would be a TypeError on 8.0, I think
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:19 PM Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 13:29, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >
> > If we go in this direction, though, then unless George agrees to withdraw
> >this RFC
>
> Zeev,
>
> I do not think you behaviour is appropriate.
>
> It's not appropriate to put pressure
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:26 PM Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> ... wholesale compatibility break-fast ...
>
* break-fest
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:51 AM Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have set up PHP as CNA (CVE Identifiers authority) with MITRE. That
> means that we will be assigning our own CVEs from now on. The process in
> broad strokes works like this:
>
> 1. We request a block of numbers
> 2. When we h
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 13:29, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> If we go in this direction, though, then unless George agrees to withdraw
>this RFC
Zeev,
I do not think you behaviour is appropriate.
It's not appropriate to put pressure on an RFC author to withdraw an
RFC after it has been voted on.
It's
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:17 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that for example the FFI RFC passed with something like 60%
> majority, even lower than this RFC. I think you're cherry-picking a bit
> here, when it comes to what should and shouldn't pass ;)
>
You're right, but I think that'
Nikita,
I'm a bit worried that using this as a standard test suite may
(repeatedly?) give us a false sense of security to go ahead with
compatibility breaking changes.
Composer packages, almost by definition - tend to be of higher quality
than the 'average' PHP code (at the very least they're
On 29/04/2019 09:01, Zeev Suraski wrote:
It's absolutely fine to dislike short tags. It's absolutely fine to
believe it shouldn't have been introduced. But the gap between that, and
thinking it's fine to remove it - is very, very big.
And how long after it's removed will 'https://lsces.co.uk/
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:02 AM Zeev Suraski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:08 PM Reinis Rozitis wrote:
>
> > Also imo the reason why people write now (and not in the discussion
> > phase) because for some time in the voting there wasn't the 2/3 majority
> > for the 7.4 (so no sense to clu
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:55 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:34 AM Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM Nikita Popov
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:33 PM Bob Weinand
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey,
> >> >
> >> > I feel like concatenati
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:32 PM G. P. B. wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 14:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>> As I said numerous times in the past, I'm a firm believer that
controversial RFCs (ones that generate a lot of votes with a substantial
number of opposers) should not pass. I thin
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:34 AM Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:33 PM Bob Weinand wrote:
>>
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > I feel like concatenation having the same precedence than addition and
>> > subtraction is promoting pr
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:44 AM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:05 PM Gabriel Caruso
> wrote:
>
> > Currently, if you pass an argument that is not an integer, it will simply
> > return an empty string: https://3v4l.org/FF2nA.
>
>
> Not entirely accurate. It outputs a one-characte
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:52 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:33 PM Bob Weinand wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > I feel like concatenation having the same precedence than addition and
> > subtraction is promoting programmers to make mistakes. Albeit typically
> > easy to catch ones,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 1:47 PM Theodore Brown
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:25 PM Stanislav Malyshev
> wrote:
>
> > I am not exactly against this feature, but the potential for abuse
> > \- like enabling people using integers for things that are not
> > integers and should not be stored a
Am 25.04.2019 um 11:52 schrieb Nikita Popov
mailto:nikita@gmail.com>>:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:33 PM Bob Weinand
mailto:bobw...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hey,
I feel like concatenation having the same precedence than addition and
subtraction is promoting programmers to make mistakes. Albeit
18 matches
Mail list logo
